国家,欧洲或全球

M. Hesselink
{"title":"国家,欧洲或全球","authors":"M. Hesselink","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192843654.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter addresses the Europeanization of contract law from a normative perspective: can the Europeanization of contract law be justified? Or are there more convincing reasons why contract law should remain national or become global? Do we perhaps have a moral right to a European civil code? Or, conversely, are we entitled to make our contract law entirely national again? Should the integrity of national legal cultures be respected, or should a (re)nascent European legal culture be fostered? The chapter aims to provide a better explanation of why and how the question of the Europeanization of contract law has been so divisive and why neither the status quo, nor fully undoing the Europeanization of private law, nor indeed a move fast forward towards a European civil code, seem today to be alternatives commanding widespread support.","PeriodicalId":105562,"journal":{"name":"Justifying Contract in Europe","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National, European, or Global\",\"authors\":\"M. Hesselink\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780192843654.003.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter addresses the Europeanization of contract law from a normative perspective: can the Europeanization of contract law be justified? Or are there more convincing reasons why contract law should remain national or become global? Do we perhaps have a moral right to a European civil code? Or, conversely, are we entitled to make our contract law entirely national again? Should the integrity of national legal cultures be respected, or should a (re)nascent European legal culture be fostered? The chapter aims to provide a better explanation of why and how the question of the Europeanization of contract law has been so divisive and why neither the status quo, nor fully undoing the Europeanization of private law, nor indeed a move fast forward towards a European civil code, seem today to be alternatives commanding widespread support.\",\"PeriodicalId\":105562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Justifying Contract in Europe\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Justifying Contract in Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192843654.003.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justifying Contract in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192843654.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章从规范的角度探讨了合同法的欧洲化:合同法的欧洲化是否合理?或者是否有更令人信服的理由说明合同法应该保持国家化还是全球化?我们是否有道德上的权利使用欧洲民法典?或者,反过来说,我们是否有权使我们的合同法再次完全国家化?是应该尊重国家法律文化的完整性,还是应该培育一种(重新)新生的欧洲法律文化?本章旨在更好地解释为什么以及如何合同法的欧洲化问题如此分裂,以及为什么既不是现状,也不是完全取消私法的欧洲化,也不是向欧洲民法典快速迈进,今天似乎是获得广泛支持的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
National, European, or Global
This chapter addresses the Europeanization of contract law from a normative perspective: can the Europeanization of contract law be justified? Or are there more convincing reasons why contract law should remain national or become global? Do we perhaps have a moral right to a European civil code? Or, conversely, are we entitled to make our contract law entirely national again? Should the integrity of national legal cultures be respected, or should a (re)nascent European legal culture be fostered? The chapter aims to provide a better explanation of why and how the question of the Europeanization of contract law has been so divisive and why neither the status quo, nor fully undoing the Europeanization of private law, nor indeed a move fast forward towards a European civil code, seem today to be alternatives commanding widespread support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信