人工智能在数字证据选择性检索和扣押中的应用研究

W. Lee
{"title":"人工智能在数字证据选择性检索和扣押中的应用研究","authors":"W. Lee","doi":"10.34222/kdps.2022.14.4.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our society is already experiencing the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Therefore, most of our lives are influenced by the technology of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. One of the core values of the 4th Industrial Revolution is to rebuild the real space in the virtual space by transferring information in the real space to the virtual space. As a result, all objects, movements, and attributes in the real space are digitized and stored. Amid these changes, the importance of digital evidence is already beyond analog evidence. However, investigations and trials of crimes are still conducted only in analog spaces. Therefore, a technical device that connects the digital world and the analog world is required. The problem is that digital evidence and related legal regulations are not sufficient in the current Criminal Procedure Act. Therefore, investigative agencies have a difficult task to collect digital evidence and prove guilt in accordance with precedents and internal regulations. \nArticle 106 of the Criminal Procedure Act stipulates a method of confiscating digital evidence. The problem is that among the suspect’s numerous information, it is not easy to collect only information related to criminal charges without violating the suspect’s basic rights. Therefore, as a way to overcome such difficulties, a method of performing seizure using a technical method such as artificial intelligence is being considered. Therefore, as a countermeasure against it, first of all, ground rules for legal procedures must be prepared. In addition, the reliability of artificial intelligence application technology should be recognized from a trusted institution, and users should be able to control the artificial intelligence technology used for screening and seizure. As technology develops in the future, similar problems may continue to occur. Therefore, comprehensive research related to the digital evidence legal system and technology system is needed.","PeriodicalId":384688,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Association of Criminal Procedure Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for the Selective Search and Seizure of Digital Evidence\",\"authors\":\"W. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.34222/kdps.2022.14.4.65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our society is already experiencing the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Therefore, most of our lives are influenced by the technology of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. One of the core values of the 4th Industrial Revolution is to rebuild the real space in the virtual space by transferring information in the real space to the virtual space. As a result, all objects, movements, and attributes in the real space are digitized and stored. Amid these changes, the importance of digital evidence is already beyond analog evidence. However, investigations and trials of crimes are still conducted only in analog spaces. Therefore, a technical device that connects the digital world and the analog world is required. The problem is that digital evidence and related legal regulations are not sufficient in the current Criminal Procedure Act. Therefore, investigative agencies have a difficult task to collect digital evidence and prove guilt in accordance with precedents and internal regulations. \\nArticle 106 of the Criminal Procedure Act stipulates a method of confiscating digital evidence. The problem is that among the suspect’s numerous information, it is not easy to collect only information related to criminal charges without violating the suspect’s basic rights. Therefore, as a way to overcome such difficulties, a method of performing seizure using a technical method such as artificial intelligence is being considered. Therefore, as a countermeasure against it, first of all, ground rules for legal procedures must be prepared. In addition, the reliability of artificial intelligence application technology should be recognized from a trusted institution, and users should be able to control the artificial intelligence technology used for screening and seizure. As technology develops in the future, similar problems may continue to occur. Therefore, comprehensive research related to the digital evidence legal system and technology system is needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":384688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean Association of Criminal Procedure Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean Association of Criminal Procedure Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34222/kdps.2022.14.4.65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Association of Criminal Procedure Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34222/kdps.2022.14.4.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的社会已经在经历第四次工业革命。因此,我们的大部分生活都受到第四次工业革命技术的影响。第四次工业革命的核心价值之一是通过将真实空间中的信息传递到虚拟空间中,在虚拟空间中重建真实空间。因此,真实空间中的所有物体、运动和属性都被数字化并存储。在这些变化中,数字证据的重要性已经超越了模拟证据。然而,对犯罪的调查和审判仍然只在模拟空间中进行。因此,需要一种连接数字世界和模拟世界的技术设备。问题在于,现行《刑事诉讼法》中数字证据和相关法律规定不够充分。因此,调查机关很难根据先例和内部规定收集数字证据并证明有罪。《刑事诉讼法》第106条规定了没收数字证据的方法。问题是,在嫌疑人的众多信息中,在不侵犯嫌疑人基本权利的情况下,很难只收集与刑事指控有关的信息。因此,作为克服上述困难的方法,正在研究利用人工智能等技术方法实施扣押的方法。因此,作为对策,首先必须制定法律程序的基本规则。此外,人工智能应用技术的可靠性应该得到可信机构的认可,用户应该能够控制用于筛查和扣押的人工智能技术。随着未来技术的发展,类似的问题可能会继续发生。因此,有必要对数字证据法律制度和技术体系进行全面的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Study on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for the Selective Search and Seizure of Digital Evidence
Our society is already experiencing the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Therefore, most of our lives are influenced by the technology of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. One of the core values of the 4th Industrial Revolution is to rebuild the real space in the virtual space by transferring information in the real space to the virtual space. As a result, all objects, movements, and attributes in the real space are digitized and stored. Amid these changes, the importance of digital evidence is already beyond analog evidence. However, investigations and trials of crimes are still conducted only in analog spaces. Therefore, a technical device that connects the digital world and the analog world is required. The problem is that digital evidence and related legal regulations are not sufficient in the current Criminal Procedure Act. Therefore, investigative agencies have a difficult task to collect digital evidence and prove guilt in accordance with precedents and internal regulations. Article 106 of the Criminal Procedure Act stipulates a method of confiscating digital evidence. The problem is that among the suspect’s numerous information, it is not easy to collect only information related to criminal charges without violating the suspect’s basic rights. Therefore, as a way to overcome such difficulties, a method of performing seizure using a technical method such as artificial intelligence is being considered. Therefore, as a countermeasure against it, first of all, ground rules for legal procedures must be prepared. In addition, the reliability of artificial intelligence application technology should be recognized from a trusted institution, and users should be able to control the artificial intelligence technology used for screening and seizure. As technology develops in the future, similar problems may continue to occur. Therefore, comprehensive research related to the digital evidence legal system and technology system is needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信