评估企业架构中的弹性:系统回顾

Adina Aldea, Egle Vaicekauskaite, M. Daneva, J. Piest
{"title":"评估企业架构中的弹性:系统回顾","authors":"Adina Aldea, Egle Vaicekauskaite, M. Daneva, J. Piest","doi":"10.1109/EDOC49727.2020.00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review paper aims to explore state-of-the-art research and scientific literature about Enterprise Architecture (EA) resilience. Based on a systematic literature review, 850 articles have been subjected to evaluation for relevance. Based on the findings in 58 selected papers, we conclude that the field of EA resilience is still in its infancy. We identified several definitions and classified six types of resilience measures, based on information type (qualitative/quantitative), the source of the disruption (internal/external), and the duration of the resilience (short-term/long-term). Based on the review, we found 19 metrics that are candidates for EA practitioners to consider for the design of measurement and assessment methods for EA resilience. In addition, we identified relevant research from Information Systems sub-domains and other sciences that can be incorporated to create a holistic view on EA resilience. Based on published definitions of resilience in the selected papers, we propose a definition of the concept of EA resilience. This definition is validated using expert opinion and creates a starting point for reasoning about EA resilience and future research.","PeriodicalId":409420,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 24th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Resilience in Enterprise Architecture: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Adina Aldea, Egle Vaicekauskaite, M. Daneva, J. Piest\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDOC49727.2020.00011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This review paper aims to explore state-of-the-art research and scientific literature about Enterprise Architecture (EA) resilience. Based on a systematic literature review, 850 articles have been subjected to evaluation for relevance. Based on the findings in 58 selected papers, we conclude that the field of EA resilience is still in its infancy. We identified several definitions and classified six types of resilience measures, based on information type (qualitative/quantitative), the source of the disruption (internal/external), and the duration of the resilience (short-term/long-term). Based on the review, we found 19 metrics that are candidates for EA practitioners to consider for the design of measurement and assessment methods for EA resilience. In addition, we identified relevant research from Information Systems sub-domains and other sciences that can be incorporated to create a holistic view on EA resilience. Based on published definitions of resilience in the selected papers, we propose a definition of the concept of EA resilience. This definition is validated using expert opinion and creates a starting point for reasoning about EA resilience and future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":409420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE 24th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE 24th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC49727.2020.00011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 24th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC49727.2020.00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

这篇综述文章旨在探索关于企业架构(EA)弹性的最新研究和科学文献。基于系统的文献回顾,850篇文章被纳入相关性评估。根据58篇论文的研究结果,我们得出结论,EA弹性领域仍处于起步阶段。我们根据信息类型(定性/定量)、中断的来源(内部/外部)和恢复的持续时间(短期/长期)确定了几个定义并分类了六种类型的恢复措施。基于回顾,我们发现了19个度量标准,它们是EA从业者在设计EA弹性的度量和评估方法时需要考虑的候选度量标准。此外,我们确定了来自信息系统子领域和其他科学的相关研究,这些研究可以被合并以创建EA弹性的整体视图。基于已发表的论文中弹性的定义,我们提出了EA弹性概念的定义。该定义使用专家意见进行验证,并为EA弹性和未来研究的推理创造了起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Resilience in Enterprise Architecture: A Systematic Review
This review paper aims to explore state-of-the-art research and scientific literature about Enterprise Architecture (EA) resilience. Based on a systematic literature review, 850 articles have been subjected to evaluation for relevance. Based on the findings in 58 selected papers, we conclude that the field of EA resilience is still in its infancy. We identified several definitions and classified six types of resilience measures, based on information type (qualitative/quantitative), the source of the disruption (internal/external), and the duration of the resilience (short-term/long-term). Based on the review, we found 19 metrics that are candidates for EA practitioners to consider for the design of measurement and assessment methods for EA resilience. In addition, we identified relevant research from Information Systems sub-domains and other sciences that can be incorporated to create a holistic view on EA resilience. Based on published definitions of resilience in the selected papers, we propose a definition of the concept of EA resilience. This definition is validated using expert opinion and creates a starting point for reasoning about EA resilience and future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信