基于形式化方法的数据与流程图一致性检验

S. Kouno, Han-Myung Chang, K. Araki
{"title":"基于形式化方法的数据与流程图一致性检验","authors":"S. Kouno, Han-Myung Chang, K. Araki","doi":"10.1109/CMPSAC.1996.544175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most important problems in software development using CASE tools is that it is impossible to verify semantical consistency between data and procedure descriptions expressed in structured diagrams. We introduce formal methods into the CASE tools in order to verify strictly the consistency between them. We present methods for verifying that the behavior of PAD (process action diagram) keeps the data constraints of the ERD (entity relationship diagram) using the Z notation. We may improve accuracy of specification by means of giving assurance of validity among different kinds or different abstract levels of diagrams, based on the formal descriptions in Z.","PeriodicalId":306601,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 20th International Computer Software and Applications Conference: COMPSAC '96","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consistency checking between data and process diagrams based on formal methods\",\"authors\":\"S. Kouno, Han-Myung Chang, K. Araki\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CMPSAC.1996.544175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the most important problems in software development using CASE tools is that it is impossible to verify semantical consistency between data and procedure descriptions expressed in structured diagrams. We introduce formal methods into the CASE tools in order to verify strictly the consistency between them. We present methods for verifying that the behavior of PAD (process action diagram) keeps the data constraints of the ERD (entity relationship diagram) using the Z notation. We may improve accuracy of specification by means of giving assurance of validity among different kinds or different abstract levels of diagrams, based on the formal descriptions in Z.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 20th International Computer Software and Applications Conference: COMPSAC '96\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 20th International Computer Software and Applications Conference: COMPSAC '96\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CMPSAC.1996.544175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 20th International Computer Software and Applications Conference: COMPSAC '96","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CMPSAC.1996.544175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在使用CASE工具的软件开发中,最重要的问题之一是不可能验证结构化图中表达的数据和过程描述之间的语义一致性。我们在CASE工具中引入形式化的方法,以便严格地验证它们之间的一致性。我们提出了验证PAD(过程动作图)的行为使用Z符号保持ERD(实体关系图)的数据约束的方法。基于Z的形式化描述,我们可以通过在不同种类或不同抽象层次的图之间给出有效性保证来提高说明的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consistency checking between data and process diagrams based on formal methods
One of the most important problems in software development using CASE tools is that it is impossible to verify semantical consistency between data and procedure descriptions expressed in structured diagrams. We introduce formal methods into the CASE tools in order to verify strictly the consistency between them. We present methods for verifying that the behavior of PAD (process action diagram) keeps the data constraints of the ERD (entity relationship diagram) using the Z notation. We may improve accuracy of specification by means of giving assurance of validity among different kinds or different abstract levels of diagrams, based on the formal descriptions in Z.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信