研究临终对话:挑战和策略

Phyllis B. Whitehead
{"title":"研究临终对话:挑战和策略","authors":"Phyllis B. Whitehead","doi":"10.31038/ijnm.2021221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"End-of-life (EOL) conversations continue to be challenging for patients, families, and healthcare providers (HCPs) [1-3]. Although these dialogues can be emotionally charged, they are critical to ensure that care is aligned with patient preferences. Interventions directed at improving communication about EOL care have been shown to improve patient outcomes. Nurses are in a unique position to assist patients and families with advocating for EOL conversations [4,5]. Advance care planning studies are prominent in EOL literature with the intent of clarifying life sustaining treatment preferences of patients. Unfortunately, most EOL decisions are still made without direct input from patients but rather loved ones are burdened with deciding whether or not to continue life sustaining interventions. In addition, family members report that they were unaware of their loved ones wishes and values with all of the treatment options [6]. More research is needed to develop practical approaches and strategies to enhance EOL conversations to properly align patients’ priorities of care. But conducting these studies remains challenging.","PeriodicalId":305069,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Journal of Nursing and Medicine","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studying End of Life Conversations: Challenges and Strategies\",\"authors\":\"Phyllis B. Whitehead\",\"doi\":\"10.31038/ijnm.2021221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"End-of-life (EOL) conversations continue to be challenging for patients, families, and healthcare providers (HCPs) [1-3]. Although these dialogues can be emotionally charged, they are critical to ensure that care is aligned with patient preferences. Interventions directed at improving communication about EOL care have been shown to improve patient outcomes. Nurses are in a unique position to assist patients and families with advocating for EOL conversations [4,5]. Advance care planning studies are prominent in EOL literature with the intent of clarifying life sustaining treatment preferences of patients. Unfortunately, most EOL decisions are still made without direct input from patients but rather loved ones are burdened with deciding whether or not to continue life sustaining interventions. In addition, family members report that they were unaware of their loved ones wishes and values with all of the treatment options [6]. More research is needed to develop practical approaches and strategies to enhance EOL conversations to properly align patients’ priorities of care. But conducting these studies remains challenging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative Journal of Nursing and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative Journal of Nursing and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31038/ijnm.2021221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Journal of Nursing and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/ijnm.2021221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临终(EOL)对话对患者、家属和医疗保健提供者(HCPs)来说仍然是一个挑战[1-3]。尽管这些对话可能充满感情色彩,但它们对于确保护理符合患者的偏好至关重要。旨在改善EOL护理沟通的干预措施已被证明可以改善患者的预后。护士在帮助患者和家属倡导EOL对话方面处于独特的地位[4,5]。提前护理计划研究在EOL文献中是突出的,目的是澄清患者的生命维持治疗偏好。不幸的是,大多数EOL决定仍然没有患者的直接意见,而是由亲人决定是否继续维持生命的干预措施。此外,家庭成员报告说,他们不知道他们所爱的人对所有治疗方案的愿望和价值观[6]。需要更多的研究来制定切实可行的方法和策略,以加强EOL对话,以适当地调整患者的护理重点。但是进行这些研究仍然具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Studying End of Life Conversations: Challenges and Strategies
End-of-life (EOL) conversations continue to be challenging for patients, families, and healthcare providers (HCPs) [1-3]. Although these dialogues can be emotionally charged, they are critical to ensure that care is aligned with patient preferences. Interventions directed at improving communication about EOL care have been shown to improve patient outcomes. Nurses are in a unique position to assist patients and families with advocating for EOL conversations [4,5]. Advance care planning studies are prominent in EOL literature with the intent of clarifying life sustaining treatment preferences of patients. Unfortunately, most EOL decisions are still made without direct input from patients but rather loved ones are burdened with deciding whether or not to continue life sustaining interventions. In addition, family members report that they were unaware of their loved ones wishes and values with all of the treatment options [6]. More research is needed to develop practical approaches and strategies to enhance EOL conversations to properly align patients’ priorities of care. But conducting these studies remains challenging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信