{"title":"垃圾邮件检测中黏着语言特征选择方法的评估:以土耳其语为例","authors":"S. Ergin, Ş. Işık","doi":"10.1109/INISTA.2014.6873607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the assessment of three different feature selection methods including Information Gain (IG), Gini Index (GI), and CHI square (CHI2) is made by utilizing two popular pattern classifiers, namely Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Decision Tree (DT), on the classification of Turkish e-mails. The feature vectors are constructed by the bag-of-words feature extraction method. This paper is focused on the Turkish language since it is one of the widely used agglutinative languages all around the world. The results obviously reveal that CHI2 and GI feature selection methods are more efficacious than IG method for Turkish language.","PeriodicalId":339652,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA) Proceedings","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The assessment of feature selection methods on agglutinative language for spam email detection: A special case for Turkish\",\"authors\":\"S. Ergin, Ş. Işık\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INISTA.2014.6873607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, the assessment of three different feature selection methods including Information Gain (IG), Gini Index (GI), and CHI square (CHI2) is made by utilizing two popular pattern classifiers, namely Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Decision Tree (DT), on the classification of Turkish e-mails. The feature vectors are constructed by the bag-of-words feature extraction method. This paper is focused on the Turkish language since it is one of the widely used agglutinative languages all around the world. The results obviously reveal that CHI2 and GI feature selection methods are more efficacious than IG method for Turkish language.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA) Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA) Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INISTA.2014.6873607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA) Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INISTA.2014.6873607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The assessment of feature selection methods on agglutinative language for spam email detection: A special case for Turkish
In this study, the assessment of three different feature selection methods including Information Gain (IG), Gini Index (GI), and CHI square (CHI2) is made by utilizing two popular pattern classifiers, namely Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Decision Tree (DT), on the classification of Turkish e-mails. The feature vectors are constructed by the bag-of-words feature extraction method. This paper is focused on the Turkish language since it is one of the widely used agglutinative languages all around the world. The results obviously reveal that CHI2 and GI feature selection methods are more efficacious than IG method for Turkish language.