垃圾邮件检测中黏着语言特征选择方法的评估:以土耳其语为例

S. Ergin, Ş. Işık
{"title":"垃圾邮件检测中黏着语言特征选择方法的评估:以土耳其语为例","authors":"S. Ergin, Ş. Işık","doi":"10.1109/INISTA.2014.6873607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the assessment of three different feature selection methods including Information Gain (IG), Gini Index (GI), and CHI square (CHI2) is made by utilizing two popular pattern classifiers, namely Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Decision Tree (DT), on the classification of Turkish e-mails. The feature vectors are constructed by the bag-of-words feature extraction method. This paper is focused on the Turkish language since it is one of the widely used agglutinative languages all around the world. The results obviously reveal that CHI2 and GI feature selection methods are more efficacious than IG method for Turkish language.","PeriodicalId":339652,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA) Proceedings","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The assessment of feature selection methods on agglutinative language for spam email detection: A special case for Turkish\",\"authors\":\"S. Ergin, Ş. Işık\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INISTA.2014.6873607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, the assessment of three different feature selection methods including Information Gain (IG), Gini Index (GI), and CHI square (CHI2) is made by utilizing two popular pattern classifiers, namely Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Decision Tree (DT), on the classification of Turkish e-mails. The feature vectors are constructed by the bag-of-words feature extraction method. This paper is focused on the Turkish language since it is one of the widely used agglutinative languages all around the world. The results obviously reveal that CHI2 and GI feature selection methods are more efficacious than IG method for Turkish language.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA) Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA) Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INISTA.2014.6873607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA) Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INISTA.2014.6873607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在本研究中,利用人工神经网络(ANN)和决策树(DT)两种流行的模式分类器对土耳其电子邮件的分类进行了评估,包括信息增益(IG)、基尼指数(GI)和卡方(CHI2)三种不同的特征选择方法。采用词袋特征提取方法构造特征向量。本文以土耳其语为研究对象,因为它是世界上使用最广泛的粘着语之一。结果表明,CHI2和GI方法对土耳其语的特征选择比IG方法更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The assessment of feature selection methods on agglutinative language for spam email detection: A special case for Turkish
In this study, the assessment of three different feature selection methods including Information Gain (IG), Gini Index (GI), and CHI square (CHI2) is made by utilizing two popular pattern classifiers, namely Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Decision Tree (DT), on the classification of Turkish e-mails. The feature vectors are constructed by the bag-of-words feature extraction method. This paper is focused on the Turkish language since it is one of the widely used agglutinative languages all around the world. The results obviously reveal that CHI2 and GI feature selection methods are more efficacious than IG method for Turkish language.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信