猛禽对里德·所罗门的纠错码

U. Demir, Özlem Aktaş
{"title":"猛禽对里德·所罗门的纠错码","authors":"U. Demir, Özlem Aktaş","doi":"10.1109/ISCN.2006.1662545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Network conditions generally cause errors on network packets. Correction of these errors is in the subject of \"forward error correction.\" Forward error correction is divided into two categories: bit-level forward error correction and packet-level forward error correction. These two categories are unfamiliar. The aim of this study is to make a literature comparison of two alternative packet-level forward error correction codes: Raptor and Reed Solomon. Nowadays when packet-level error correction codes are mentioned, these two techniques are remembered. Reed Solomon FEC codes are found on the Internet and are tested with different network conditions. Raptor codes are commercial and not used broadly yet. But several new technologies (MBMS, DVB and etc.) uses Raptor. This study shows the cases, where Raptor and Reed Solomon are appropriate to use","PeriodicalId":304528,"journal":{"name":"2006 International Symposium on Computer Networks","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Raptor versus Reed Solomon forward error correction codes\",\"authors\":\"U. Demir, Özlem Aktaş\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISCN.2006.1662545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Network conditions generally cause errors on network packets. Correction of these errors is in the subject of \\\"forward error correction.\\\" Forward error correction is divided into two categories: bit-level forward error correction and packet-level forward error correction. These two categories are unfamiliar. The aim of this study is to make a literature comparison of two alternative packet-level forward error correction codes: Raptor and Reed Solomon. Nowadays when packet-level error correction codes are mentioned, these two techniques are remembered. Reed Solomon FEC codes are found on the Internet and are tested with different network conditions. Raptor codes are commercial and not used broadly yet. But several new technologies (MBMS, DVB and etc.) uses Raptor. This study shows the cases, where Raptor and Reed Solomon are appropriate to use\",\"PeriodicalId\":304528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 International Symposium on Computer Networks\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 International Symposium on Computer Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCN.2006.1662545\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 International Symposium on Computer Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCN.2006.1662545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

摘要

网络状况通常会导致网络报文出现错误。这些错误的纠正是在“前向纠错”的主题。前向纠错分为位级前向纠错和包级前向纠错两类。这两个类别是不熟悉的。本研究的目的是使两个替代包级前向纠错码的文献比较:猛禽和里德所罗门。现在,当提到包级纠错码时,就会想到这两种技术。里德所罗门FEC代码在互联网上找到,并在不同的网络条件下进行了测试。猛禽代码是商业的,还没有广泛使用。但一些新技术(MBMS, DVB等)使用猛禽。本研究展示了Raptor和Reed Solomon适合使用的情况
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Raptor versus Reed Solomon forward error correction codes
Network conditions generally cause errors on network packets. Correction of these errors is in the subject of "forward error correction." Forward error correction is divided into two categories: bit-level forward error correction and packet-level forward error correction. These two categories are unfamiliar. The aim of this study is to make a literature comparison of two alternative packet-level forward error correction codes: Raptor and Reed Solomon. Nowadays when packet-level error correction codes are mentioned, these two techniques are remembered. Reed Solomon FEC codes are found on the Internet and are tested with different network conditions. Raptor codes are commercial and not used broadly yet. But several new technologies (MBMS, DVB and etc.) uses Raptor. This study shows the cases, where Raptor and Reed Solomon are appropriate to use
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信