Fatima-Zahra Belouadha, Ouafa El Oinzioui, M. I. Kabbaj
{"title":"语义业务流程规范方法的基础和限制","authors":"Fatima-Zahra Belouadha, Ouafa El Oinzioui, M. I. Kabbaj","doi":"10.1109/SITA.2015.7358403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modeling languages including BPMN which is the de facto standard for business process modeling are limited to a “contemplative” modeling of their functional behavior. Its extension is necessary to allow a “productive” modeling of processes. This should facilitate their analysis, verification and automatic implementation. In this article, we analyze the related approaches proposed in this area. The aim is to highlight their limitations and identify the criteria of an approach.","PeriodicalId":174405,"journal":{"name":"2015 10th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications (SITA)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Basics and limitations of approaches for specification of semantic business processes\",\"authors\":\"Fatima-Zahra Belouadha, Ouafa El Oinzioui, M. I. Kabbaj\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SITA.2015.7358403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modeling languages including BPMN which is the de facto standard for business process modeling are limited to a “contemplative” modeling of their functional behavior. Its extension is necessary to allow a “productive” modeling of processes. This should facilitate their analysis, verification and automatic implementation. In this article, we analyze the related approaches proposed in this area. The aim is to highlight their limitations and identify the criteria of an approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":174405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 10th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications (SITA)\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 10th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications (SITA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SITA.2015.7358403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 10th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications (SITA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SITA.2015.7358403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Basics and limitations of approaches for specification of semantic business processes
Modeling languages including BPMN which is the de facto standard for business process modeling are limited to a “contemplative” modeling of their functional behavior. Its extension is necessary to allow a “productive” modeling of processes. This should facilitate their analysis, verification and automatic implementation. In this article, we analyze the related approaches proposed in this area. The aim is to highlight their limitations and identify the criteria of an approach.