{"title":"贴片与传统儿童动态心电图监测的比较","authors":"J. Hitt, Elizabeth Carter, Joseph W. May","doi":"10.1542/PEDS.147.3_MEETINGABSTRACT.1052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Patch ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) monitors may provide an advantage over traditional wired ambulatory ECG devices, such as Holter and event monitors, but there is limited data comparing their clinical impact in the pediatric population. This retrospective cohort study included outpatients 0–18 years old who received ambulatory ECG monitoring at our institution. A cohort consisting of all patients evaluated with a Holter or event monitor between 5/2011–2/2013 (prior to patch ECG use) was compared with a time-matched cohort from 2015 to 2017, when patch monitors (Zio) were the sole ambulatory ECG devices used in our practice. Chart review was conducted to determine the clinical impact of all monitor results. Cardiologists prescribed patch monitors more frequently than traditional monitors (1 per 11.5 vs 21.8 clinical encounters, p","PeriodicalId":143776,"journal":{"name":"Section on Uniformed Services Program","volume":"45 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patch Versus Traditional Ambulatory ECG Monitoring in Children\",\"authors\":\"J. Hitt, Elizabeth Carter, Joseph W. May\",\"doi\":\"10.1542/PEDS.147.3_MEETINGABSTRACT.1052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Patch ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) monitors may provide an advantage over traditional wired ambulatory ECG devices, such as Holter and event monitors, but there is limited data comparing their clinical impact in the pediatric population. This retrospective cohort study included outpatients 0–18 years old who received ambulatory ECG monitoring at our institution. A cohort consisting of all patients evaluated with a Holter or event monitor between 5/2011–2/2013 (prior to patch ECG use) was compared with a time-matched cohort from 2015 to 2017, when patch monitors (Zio) were the sole ambulatory ECG devices used in our practice. Chart review was conducted to determine the clinical impact of all monitor results. Cardiologists prescribed patch monitors more frequently than traditional monitors (1 per 11.5 vs 21.8 clinical encounters, p\",\"PeriodicalId\":143776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Section on Uniformed Services Program\",\"volume\":\"45 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Section on Uniformed Services Program\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1542/PEDS.147.3_MEETINGABSTRACT.1052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Section on Uniformed Services Program","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/PEDS.147.3_MEETINGABSTRACT.1052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
贴片动态心电图(ECG)监测器可能比传统的有线动态心电图设备(如动态心电图和事件监测器)具有优势,但比较它们在儿科人群中的临床影响的数据有限。本回顾性队列研究纳入0-18岁 岁在我院接受动态心电图监测的门诊患者。将2011年5月至2013年2月(在使用贴片ECG之前)使用动态心电图或事件监测器评估的所有患者与2015年至2017年时间匹配的队列进行比较,当时贴片监测器(Zio)是我们实践中唯一使用的动态心电图设备。进行图表回顾以确定所有监测结果的临床影响。心脏病专家开出贴片监测器的频率高于传统监测器(1 / 11.5 vs 21.8)
Patch Versus Traditional Ambulatory ECG Monitoring in Children
Abstract Patch ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) monitors may provide an advantage over traditional wired ambulatory ECG devices, such as Holter and event monitors, but there is limited data comparing their clinical impact in the pediatric population. This retrospective cohort study included outpatients 0–18 years old who received ambulatory ECG monitoring at our institution. A cohort consisting of all patients evaluated with a Holter or event monitor between 5/2011–2/2013 (prior to patch ECG use) was compared with a time-matched cohort from 2015 to 2017, when patch monitors (Zio) were the sole ambulatory ECG devices used in our practice. Chart review was conducted to determine the clinical impact of all monitor results. Cardiologists prescribed patch monitors more frequently than traditional monitors (1 per 11.5 vs 21.8 clinical encounters, p