许可区块链上的公平工作分配:基于移动窗口的方法

I. Malakhov, A. Marin, S. Rossi, D. Smuseva
{"title":"许可区块链上的公平工作分配:基于移动窗口的方法","authors":"I. Malakhov, A. Marin, S. Rossi, D. Smuseva","doi":"10.1109/Blockchain50366.2020.00063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In permissioned blockchains, a set of identifiable miners are in charge of consolidating the new blocks. The agreement protocol is usually based on a consensus mechanism inspired by a voting Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) mechanism rather than the well-known proof-of-work (PoW). However, PoW provides some benefits with respect to BFT, i.e., it allows the final user to quantify the effort required to change a consolidated transaction without the need of trusting the consortium of miners.In this paper, we address some of the problems that arise from the application of PoW in permissioned blockchains. In fact, in standard PoW, it may be easy for one miner to temporary reach 50% of the total hash power and since mining rewards are usually not expected, the problem of balancing the efforts of the miner becomes crucial.We propose a simple solution based on a sliding window algorithm to address these problems and analyse its effectiveness in terms of security. Additionally, we propose a quantitative model whose solution allows us to assess its capacity of balancing the hash power provided by heterogeneous miners.","PeriodicalId":109440,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain)","volume":"496 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fair Work Distribution on Permissioned Blockchains: a Mobile Window Based Approach\",\"authors\":\"I. Malakhov, A. Marin, S. Rossi, D. Smuseva\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/Blockchain50366.2020.00063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In permissioned blockchains, a set of identifiable miners are in charge of consolidating the new blocks. The agreement protocol is usually based on a consensus mechanism inspired by a voting Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) mechanism rather than the well-known proof-of-work (PoW). However, PoW provides some benefits with respect to BFT, i.e., it allows the final user to quantify the effort required to change a consolidated transaction without the need of trusting the consortium of miners.In this paper, we address some of the problems that arise from the application of PoW in permissioned blockchains. In fact, in standard PoW, it may be easy for one miner to temporary reach 50% of the total hash power and since mining rewards are usually not expected, the problem of balancing the efforts of the miner becomes crucial.We propose a simple solution based on a sliding window algorithm to address these problems and analyse its effectiveness in terms of security. Additionally, we propose a quantitative model whose solution allows us to assess its capacity of balancing the hash power provided by heterogeneous miners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":109440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain)\",\"volume\":\"496 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/Blockchain50366.2020.00063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/Blockchain50366.2020.00063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在被许可的区块链中,一组可识别的矿工负责整合新区块。协议协议通常基于受投票拜占庭容错(BFT)机制启发的共识机制,而不是众所周知的工作量证明(PoW)。然而,相对于BFT, PoW提供了一些好处,即它允许最终用户量化更改合并交易所需的工作量,而无需信任矿工联盟。在本文中,我们解决了PoW在许可区块链中的应用所产生的一些问题。事实上,在标准PoW中,一个矿工可能很容易暂时达到总哈希算力的50%,而且由于采矿奖励通常不被期望,因此平衡矿工努力的问题变得至关重要。我们提出了一种基于滑动窗口算法的简单解决方案来解决这些问题,并从安全性方面分析了其有效性。此外,我们提出了一个定量模型,其解决方案允许我们评估其平衡异构矿工提供的哈希算力的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fair Work Distribution on Permissioned Blockchains: a Mobile Window Based Approach
In permissioned blockchains, a set of identifiable miners are in charge of consolidating the new blocks. The agreement protocol is usually based on a consensus mechanism inspired by a voting Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) mechanism rather than the well-known proof-of-work (PoW). However, PoW provides some benefits with respect to BFT, i.e., it allows the final user to quantify the effort required to change a consolidated transaction without the need of trusting the consortium of miners.In this paper, we address some of the problems that arise from the application of PoW in permissioned blockchains. In fact, in standard PoW, it may be easy for one miner to temporary reach 50% of the total hash power and since mining rewards are usually not expected, the problem of balancing the efforts of the miner becomes crucial.We propose a simple solution based on a sliding window algorithm to address these problems and analyse its effectiveness in terms of security. Additionally, we propose a quantitative model whose solution allows us to assess its capacity of balancing the hash power provided by heterogeneous miners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信