Maciej Kassner
{"title":"Interpretacjonizm w nauce o polityce. Stanowisko Charlesa Taylora na tle współczesnych debat o tożsamości politologii","authors":"Maciej Kassner","doi":"10.15584/polispol.2021.4.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is an intervention into the ongoing debate about the identity of political science. Drawing on the views of Charles Taylor, it argues for the interpretive model of political science. Interpretive political science maintains that (1) political practices and institutions are constituted by intersubjective meaning; (2) it is impossible to draw a clear-cut distinction between normative and empirical theory since any non-trivial political theory is bound to reveal some value slope. The article argues that the interpretative approach not only can provide a better explanation of current research practice within political science but also opens promising vistas for future research.","PeriodicalId":403819,"journal":{"name":"Polityka i Społeczeństwo","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polityka i Społeczeństwo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15584/polispol.2021.4.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章是对正在进行的关于政治学身份的辩论的一种干预。借鉴查尔斯·泰勒的观点,它论证了政治科学的解释模型。解释政治学认为:(1)政治实践和政治制度是由主体间意义构成的;(2)在规范理论和经验理论之间划清界限是不可能的,因为任何重要的政治理论都必然会显示出一些价值斜率。本文认为,解释性方法不仅可以更好地解释当前政治科学的研究实践,而且为未来的研究开辟了广阔的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interpretacjonizm w nauce o polityce. Stanowisko Charlesa Taylora na tle współczesnych debat o tożsamości politologii
The article is an intervention into the ongoing debate about the identity of political science. Drawing on the views of Charles Taylor, it argues for the interpretive model of political science. Interpretive political science maintains that (1) political practices and institutions are constituted by intersubjective meaning; (2) it is impossible to draw a clear-cut distinction between normative and empirical theory since any non-trivial political theory is bound to reveal some value slope. The article argues that the interpretative approach not only can provide a better explanation of current research practice within political science but also opens promising vistas for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信