少即是多:敏捷开发的架构文档

I. Hadar, Sofia Sherman, E. Hadar, John J. Harrison
{"title":"少即是多:敏捷开发的架构文档","authors":"I. Hadar, Sofia Sherman, E. Hadar, John J. Harrison","doi":"10.1109/CHASE.2013.6614746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of agile development methodologies in the software industry has increased significantly over the past decade. This has led to efforts to adjust these methodologies to enterprise products and complex systems' development, and specifically to combine the requirement of minimalism with the need for well-defined up-front architecture artifacts. Nevertheless, in many cases, architecture is accompanied with extensive documentation that requires significant effort to review and maintain throughout the development lifecycle. This paper presents a case study that aims at identifying difficulties architects and other stakeholders encounter when dealing with architecture documentation in agile development. The findings indicate that the architecture specification document is usually very long, complex, and not self-explanatory. In order to adjust the architecture documentation to the lean and minimal documentation approach of agile processes, we propose a considerably shorter abstract specification document, requiring reduced documentation efforts and resulting in a lean documentation that is easier to review, update, and communicate.","PeriodicalId":118499,"journal":{"name":"2013 6th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)","volume":"64 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Less is more: Architecture documentation for agile development\",\"authors\":\"I. Hadar, Sofia Sherman, E. Hadar, John J. Harrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CHASE.2013.6614746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of agile development methodologies in the software industry has increased significantly over the past decade. This has led to efforts to adjust these methodologies to enterprise products and complex systems' development, and specifically to combine the requirement of minimalism with the need for well-defined up-front architecture artifacts. Nevertheless, in many cases, architecture is accompanied with extensive documentation that requires significant effort to review and maintain throughout the development lifecycle. This paper presents a case study that aims at identifying difficulties architects and other stakeholders encounter when dealing with architecture documentation in agile development. The findings indicate that the architecture specification document is usually very long, complex, and not self-explanatory. In order to adjust the architecture documentation to the lean and minimal documentation approach of agile processes, we propose a considerably shorter abstract specification document, requiring reduced documentation efforts and resulting in a lean documentation that is easier to review, update, and communicate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118499,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 6th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)\",\"volume\":\"64 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 6th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CHASE.2013.6614746\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 6th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CHASE.2013.6614746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

在过去的十年中,敏捷开发方法在软件行业中的使用显著增加。这导致了调整这些方法以适应企业产品和复杂系统开发的努力,特别是将极简主义的需求与定义良好的前期体系结构工件的需求结合起来。然而,在许多情况下,架构伴随着大量的文档,需要在整个开发生命周期中进行大量的审查和维护。本文提供了一个案例研究,旨在确定架构师和其他涉众在处理敏捷开发中的架构文档时遇到的困难。结果表明,体系结构规范文档通常很长、很复杂,而且不能自我解释。为了将架构文档调整为敏捷过程的精简和最小化文档方法,我们提出了一个相当短的抽象规范文档,这需要减少编写文档的工作,并导致更容易审查、更新和交流的精简文档。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Less is more: Architecture documentation for agile development
The use of agile development methodologies in the software industry has increased significantly over the past decade. This has led to efforts to adjust these methodologies to enterprise products and complex systems' development, and specifically to combine the requirement of minimalism with the need for well-defined up-front architecture artifacts. Nevertheless, in many cases, architecture is accompanied with extensive documentation that requires significant effort to review and maintain throughout the development lifecycle. This paper presents a case study that aims at identifying difficulties architects and other stakeholders encounter when dealing with architecture documentation in agile development. The findings indicate that the architecture specification document is usually very long, complex, and not self-explanatory. In order to adjust the architecture documentation to the lean and minimal documentation approach of agile processes, we propose a considerably shorter abstract specification document, requiring reduced documentation efforts and resulting in a lean documentation that is easier to review, update, and communicate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信