{"title":"正在进行的学习者在增强现实中的主观体验测量:ARcis问卷的首次评估","authors":"Jule M. Krüger, Daniel Bodemer","doi":"10.23919/iLRN55037.2022.9815900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to effectively use augmented reality (AR) for learning support, it is important to take into account learners’ subjective AR-specific learning experience. In this work-in-progress paper, a first version of the ARcis questionnaire intended to measure learners’ perception of contextuality, interactivity, and spatiality in AR-based learning environments is presented. Results of a first implementation of this questionnaire in four studies (total N = 456) with different AR-based learning materials are described. Analyses of reliability and factor structure of the questionnaire show promising first outcomes on which suggestions for adaptations and future validation strategies are made.","PeriodicalId":215411,"journal":{"name":"2022 8th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Work-in-Progress—Measuring Learners’ Subjective Experience in Augmented Reality: First Evaluation of the ARcis Questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"Jule M. Krüger, Daniel Bodemer\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/iLRN55037.2022.9815900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to effectively use augmented reality (AR) for learning support, it is important to take into account learners’ subjective AR-specific learning experience. In this work-in-progress paper, a first version of the ARcis questionnaire intended to measure learners’ perception of contextuality, interactivity, and spatiality in AR-based learning environments is presented. Results of a first implementation of this questionnaire in four studies (total N = 456) with different AR-based learning materials are described. Analyses of reliability and factor structure of the questionnaire show promising first outcomes on which suggestions for adaptations and future validation strategies are made.\",\"PeriodicalId\":215411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 8th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN)\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 8th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/iLRN55037.2022.9815900\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 8th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/iLRN55037.2022.9815900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Work-in-Progress—Measuring Learners’ Subjective Experience in Augmented Reality: First Evaluation of the ARcis Questionnaire
In order to effectively use augmented reality (AR) for learning support, it is important to take into account learners’ subjective AR-specific learning experience. In this work-in-progress paper, a first version of the ARcis questionnaire intended to measure learners’ perception of contextuality, interactivity, and spatiality in AR-based learning environments is presented. Results of a first implementation of this questionnaire in four studies (total N = 456) with different AR-based learning materials are described. Analyses of reliability and factor structure of the questionnaire show promising first outcomes on which suggestions for adaptations and future validation strategies are made.