[上海医科大学附属大学附属医院急诊服务疾病严重程度评价]。

A J Peixoto Filho, F A de Vasconcelos, R M da Silva, L J Botelho
{"title":"[上海医科大学附属大学附属医院急诊服务疾病严重程度评价]。","authors":"A J Peixoto Filho,&nbsp;F A de Vasconcelos,&nbsp;R M da Silva,&nbsp;L J Botelho","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to determine whether emergency wards are inappropriately used we undertook a prospective study to evaluate the severeness of condition of patients seen at the UFSC University Hospital Emergency Ward. The time required for adequate therapeutic intervention was used as the main criterion of severity. Patients considered themselves to be emergencies in 16.6% of cases, whereas physicians thought so in only 2.6% (initial evaluation) and 1.0% (final evaluation) of cases. Sixty five percent of the patients could have been taken care of at a primary care site. The main reasons that prevented the use of a primary care unit were the more rapid and more convenient emergency room facilities. We conclude that the UFSC University Hospital Emergency Room is inappropriately used and suggest possible measures to improve health care delivery to the general public.</p>","PeriodicalId":75471,"journal":{"name":"AMB : revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira","volume":"37 2","pages":"91-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evaluation of severity of illness in the emergency service of the university hospital of UFSC].\",\"authors\":\"A J Peixoto Filho,&nbsp;F A de Vasconcelos,&nbsp;R M da Silva,&nbsp;L J Botelho\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In order to determine whether emergency wards are inappropriately used we undertook a prospective study to evaluate the severeness of condition of patients seen at the UFSC University Hospital Emergency Ward. The time required for adequate therapeutic intervention was used as the main criterion of severity. Patients considered themselves to be emergencies in 16.6% of cases, whereas physicians thought so in only 2.6% (initial evaluation) and 1.0% (final evaluation) of cases. Sixty five percent of the patients could have been taken care of at a primary care site. The main reasons that prevented the use of a primary care unit were the more rapid and more convenient emergency room facilities. We conclude that the UFSC University Hospital Emergency Room is inappropriately used and suggest possible measures to improve health care delivery to the general public.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMB : revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira\",\"volume\":\"37 2\",\"pages\":\"91-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMB : revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMB : revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了确定急诊病房是否被不恰当地使用,我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,以评估在UFSC大学医院急诊病房就诊的患者的病情严重程度。适当的治疗干预所需的时间被用作严重程度的主要标准。在16.6%的病例中,患者认为自己是紧急情况,而医生认为自己是紧急情况的病例仅占2.6%(初步评估)和1.0%(最终评估)。65%的病人本可以在初级保健中心得到治疗。阻止使用初级保健单位的主要原因是急诊室设施更快速和更方便。我们的结论是,UFSC大学医院急诊室使用不当,并提出可能的措施,以改善向公众提供的卫生保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Evaluation of severity of illness in the emergency service of the university hospital of UFSC].

In order to determine whether emergency wards are inappropriately used we undertook a prospective study to evaluate the severeness of condition of patients seen at the UFSC University Hospital Emergency Ward. The time required for adequate therapeutic intervention was used as the main criterion of severity. Patients considered themselves to be emergencies in 16.6% of cases, whereas physicians thought so in only 2.6% (initial evaluation) and 1.0% (final evaluation) of cases. Sixty five percent of the patients could have been taken care of at a primary care site. The main reasons that prevented the use of a primary care unit were the more rapid and more convenient emergency room facilities. We conclude that the UFSC University Hospital Emergency Room is inappropriately used and suggest possible measures to improve health care delivery to the general public.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信