Ismail Bustany, Jinwook Jung, P. Madden, Natarajan Viswanathan, Stephen Yang
{"title":"这么多年了，还在做基准测试","authors":"Ismail Bustany, Jinwook Jung, P. Madden, Natarajan Viswanathan, Stephen Yang","doi":"10.1145/3439706.3446885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Circuit benchmarks for VLSI physical design have been growing in size and complexity, helping the industry tackle new problems and find new approaches. In this paper, we take a look back at how benchmarking efforts have shaped the research community, consider trade-offs that have been made, and speculate on what may come next.","PeriodicalId":184050,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 International Symposium on Physical Design","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Still Benchmarking After All These Years\",\"authors\":\"Ismail Bustany, Jinwook Jung, P. Madden, Natarajan Viswanathan, Stephen Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3439706.3446885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Circuit benchmarks for VLSI physical design have been growing in size and complexity, helping the industry tackle new problems and find new approaches. In this paper, we take a look back at how benchmarking efforts have shaped the research community, consider trade-offs that have been made, and speculate on what may come next.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2021 International Symposium on Physical Design\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2021 International Symposium on Physical Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3439706.3446885\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 International Symposium on Physical Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3439706.3446885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Circuit benchmarks for VLSI physical design have been growing in size and complexity, helping the industry tackle new problems and find new approaches. In this paper, we take a look back at how benchmarking efforts have shaped the research community, consider trade-offs that have been made, and speculate on what may come next.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
