病人在自愿终止妊娠护理中的自主权:在圣经(妥拉,圣经和可兰经)中的地位是什么?

Eva Bieronski, Pablo Medina
{"title":"病人在自愿终止妊娠护理中的自主权:在圣经(妥拉,圣经和可兰经)中的地位是什么?","authors":"Eva Bieronski, Pablo Medina","doi":"10.33513/pegh/1801-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The principle of personal autonomy in medical law has historically been defined in two ways: the impossibility of considering the human being as one thing and of harming his physical integrity and human tissues. The principle of unavailability of the human body makes the individual autonomous. Concerning abortion care, these two principles are forgotten in most countries of the world (60%, UN). On the contrary, the status of women is equal to that of the embryo in those countries where abortion is prohibited (e.g., UAE, USA, Poland). Women’s autonomy does not have the same consideration as that of the individual in most countries of the world. The interpretation of the holy texts served as justification for this difference in treatment. The analysis of holy texts and jurisprudences will make it possible to distinguish the theory of origin from the effectiveness that has been achieved in practice.","PeriodicalId":236364,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Autonomy of the Patient in Voluntary Termination of Pregnancy Care: What is the Position in the Holy Texts (The Torah, Bible and Koran)?\",\"authors\":\"Eva Bieronski, Pablo Medina\",\"doi\":\"10.33513/pegh/1801-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The principle of personal autonomy in medical law has historically been defined in two ways: the impossibility of considering the human being as one thing and of harming his physical integrity and human tissues. The principle of unavailability of the human body makes the individual autonomous. Concerning abortion care, these two principles are forgotten in most countries of the world (60%, UN). On the contrary, the status of women is equal to that of the embryo in those countries where abortion is prohibited (e.g., UAE, USA, Poland). Women’s autonomy does not have the same consideration as that of the individual in most countries of the world. The interpretation of the holy texts served as justification for this difference in treatment. The analysis of holy texts and jurisprudences will make it possible to distinguish the theory of origin from the effectiveness that has been achieved in practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primary Care Epidemiology and Global Health\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primary Care Epidemiology and Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33513/pegh/1801-01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33513/pegh/1801-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在历史上,医疗法律中的个人自主原则被定义为两种方式:不可能将人视为一个整体,也不可能伤害他的身体完整和人体组织。人体不可用的原则使个体具有自主性。关于堕胎护理,这两个原则在世界上大多数国家被遗忘(60%,联合国)。相反,在禁止堕胎的国家(如阿联酋、美国、波兰),妇女的地位与胚胎的地位是平等的。在世界上大多数国家,妇女的自主权没有得到与个人自主权同样的重视。对神圣文本的解释成为这种待遇差异的理由。神圣的文本和法律的分析将有可能区分起源的理论在实践中取得的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Autonomy of the Patient in Voluntary Termination of Pregnancy Care: What is the Position in the Holy Texts (The Torah, Bible and Koran)?
The principle of personal autonomy in medical law has historically been defined in two ways: the impossibility of considering the human being as one thing and of harming his physical integrity and human tissues. The principle of unavailability of the human body makes the individual autonomous. Concerning abortion care, these two principles are forgotten in most countries of the world (60%, UN). On the contrary, the status of women is equal to that of the embryo in those countries where abortion is prohibited (e.g., UAE, USA, Poland). Women’s autonomy does not have the same consideration as that of the individual in most countries of the world. The interpretation of the holy texts served as justification for this difference in treatment. The analysis of holy texts and jurisprudences will make it possible to distinguish the theory of origin from the effectiveness that has been achieved in practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信