小型模块化反应堆用印刷电路蒸汽发生器热水力建模方法综述

So-Bin Cho, Chengqi Wang, T. Allen, Xiaodong Sun
{"title":"小型模块化反应堆用印刷电路蒸汽发生器热水力建模方法综述","authors":"So-Bin Cho, Chengqi Wang, T. Allen, Xiaodong Sun","doi":"10.1115/imece2022-96578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) are promising to address a wide range of energy needs. Steam generator (SG) is usually one of the largest and most expensive components in a nuclear energy system. Therefore, the overall economics of an SMR plant employing a steam Rankine cycle is strongly influenced by its SG selection. Previous case studies conducted at the Idaho National Laboratory, assessing the techno-economic performance of advanced reactors for water desalination and hydrogen production, have mostly focused on reactor system options with conventional U-tube SGs or helical-coil SGs. Incorporating a two-phase Printed Circuit Heat Exchanger (PCHE) as a SG, termed a Printed Circuit Steam Generator (PCSG), has the potential to further improve the plant economics by significantly reducing the system volume through its enhanced compactness. This paper summarizes an ongoing effort to access the thermal-hydraulic performance of a PCSG for SMRs and establishes a reference model using the correlations that have been adopted and benchmarked by the latest PCSG modeling study. Our results suggest that using a one-dimensional (1-D) code for outlet temperature calculations (i.e., the hot and cold sides) and a pressure drop calculation for the single-phase flow (i.e., the hot side) can be as accurate as those in the three-dimensional (3-D) code used in Ocampo’s study in 2020 (typically less than 0.5 % and 7 % differences, respectively). However, it is noted that the calculated pressure drop for the cold side shows as high as 4 % and 25 % of discrepancies between the correlations and the dimension of simulation (i.e., 1-D and 3-D), respectively. The identified ranges of the uncertainties from this inter-model comparison would support the development of PCSG designs for SMRs while urging researchers to develop validated thermal-hydraulic models for PCSG.","PeriodicalId":292222,"journal":{"name":"Volume 8: Fluids Engineering; Heat Transfer and Thermal Engineering","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Thermal-Hydraulic Modeling Methods of Printed Circuit Steam Generators for Small Modular Reactors\",\"authors\":\"So-Bin Cho, Chengqi Wang, T. Allen, Xiaodong Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/imece2022-96578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) are promising to address a wide range of energy needs. Steam generator (SG) is usually one of the largest and most expensive components in a nuclear energy system. Therefore, the overall economics of an SMR plant employing a steam Rankine cycle is strongly influenced by its SG selection. Previous case studies conducted at the Idaho National Laboratory, assessing the techno-economic performance of advanced reactors for water desalination and hydrogen production, have mostly focused on reactor system options with conventional U-tube SGs or helical-coil SGs. Incorporating a two-phase Printed Circuit Heat Exchanger (PCHE) as a SG, termed a Printed Circuit Steam Generator (PCSG), has the potential to further improve the plant economics by significantly reducing the system volume through its enhanced compactness. This paper summarizes an ongoing effort to access the thermal-hydraulic performance of a PCSG for SMRs and establishes a reference model using the correlations that have been adopted and benchmarked by the latest PCSG modeling study. Our results suggest that using a one-dimensional (1-D) code for outlet temperature calculations (i.e., the hot and cold sides) and a pressure drop calculation for the single-phase flow (i.e., the hot side) can be as accurate as those in the three-dimensional (3-D) code used in Ocampo’s study in 2020 (typically less than 0.5 % and 7 % differences, respectively). However, it is noted that the calculated pressure drop for the cold side shows as high as 4 % and 25 % of discrepancies between the correlations and the dimension of simulation (i.e., 1-D and 3-D), respectively. The identified ranges of the uncertainties from this inter-model comparison would support the development of PCSG designs for SMRs while urging researchers to develop validated thermal-hydraulic models for PCSG.\",\"PeriodicalId\":292222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 8: Fluids Engineering; Heat Transfer and Thermal Engineering\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 8: Fluids Engineering; Heat Transfer and Thermal Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2022-96578\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 8: Fluids Engineering; Heat Transfer and Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2022-96578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

小型模块化反应堆(smr)有望满足广泛的能源需求。蒸汽发生器(SG)通常是核能系统中最大、最昂贵的部件之一。因此,采用蒸汽朗肯循环的小型反应堆电厂的整体经济性受到其SG选择的强烈影响。之前在爱达荷国家实验室进行的案例研究,评估了用于海水淡化和制氢的先进反应器的技术经济性能,主要集中在传统u管SGs或螺旋盘管SGs的反应器系统选择上。将两相印刷电路热交换器(PCHE)作为SG,称为印刷电路蒸汽发生器(PCSG),通过其增强的紧凑性显着减少系统体积,有可能进一步提高工厂的经济效益。本文总结了目前为获取smr的PCSG热工性能所做的努力,并利用最新的PCSG建模研究所采用的相关性建立了一个参考模型。我们的研究结果表明,使用一维(1-D)代码进行出口温度计算(即热侧和冷侧)和单相流(即热侧)的压降计算可以与奥坎波在2020年的研究中使用的三维(3-D)代码一样精确(通常分别小于0.5%和7%)。然而,值得注意的是,计算出的冷侧压降在相关性和模拟维度(即1-D和3-D)之间分别显示高达4%和25%的差异。从这种模型间比较中确定的不确定性范围将支持smr的PCSG设计的发展,同时敦促研究人员为PCSG开发有效的热工水力模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of Thermal-Hydraulic Modeling Methods of Printed Circuit Steam Generators for Small Modular Reactors
Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) are promising to address a wide range of energy needs. Steam generator (SG) is usually one of the largest and most expensive components in a nuclear energy system. Therefore, the overall economics of an SMR plant employing a steam Rankine cycle is strongly influenced by its SG selection. Previous case studies conducted at the Idaho National Laboratory, assessing the techno-economic performance of advanced reactors for water desalination and hydrogen production, have mostly focused on reactor system options with conventional U-tube SGs or helical-coil SGs. Incorporating a two-phase Printed Circuit Heat Exchanger (PCHE) as a SG, termed a Printed Circuit Steam Generator (PCSG), has the potential to further improve the plant economics by significantly reducing the system volume through its enhanced compactness. This paper summarizes an ongoing effort to access the thermal-hydraulic performance of a PCSG for SMRs and establishes a reference model using the correlations that have been adopted and benchmarked by the latest PCSG modeling study. Our results suggest that using a one-dimensional (1-D) code for outlet temperature calculations (i.e., the hot and cold sides) and a pressure drop calculation for the single-phase flow (i.e., the hot side) can be as accurate as those in the three-dimensional (3-D) code used in Ocampo’s study in 2020 (typically less than 0.5 % and 7 % differences, respectively). However, it is noted that the calculated pressure drop for the cold side shows as high as 4 % and 25 % of discrepancies between the correlations and the dimension of simulation (i.e., 1-D and 3-D), respectively. The identified ranges of the uncertainties from this inter-model comparison would support the development of PCSG designs for SMRs while urging researchers to develop validated thermal-hydraulic models for PCSG.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信