肺外标本分枝杆菌DNA提取方法的比较

K. Shadia, S. Anwar, S. Banu, A. Saleh, R. Miah
{"title":"肺外标本分枝杆菌DNA提取方法的比较","authors":"K. Shadia, S. Anwar, S. Banu, A. Saleh, R. Miah","doi":"10.3329/IMCJ.V6I1.14711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sensitivity of the molecular diagnostic tests of extrapulmonary tuberculosis largely depends upon the efficiency of DNA extraction methods. The objective of our study was to compare three methods of extracting DNA of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for testing by polymerase chain reaction. All three methods; heating, heating with sonication and addition of lysis buffer with heating and sonication were implicated on 20 extrapulmonary samples. PCR positivity was 2 (10%), 4 (20%) and 7 (35%) in the samples extracted by heating, heat+sonication and heat+sonication+lysis buffer method respectively. Of the extraction methods evaluated, maximum PCR positive results were achieved by combined heat, sonication and lysis buffer method which can be applied in routine clinical practice. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/imcj.v6i1.14711 Ibrahim Med. Coll. J. 2012; 6(1): 9-11","PeriodicalId":226732,"journal":{"name":"Ibrahim Medical College Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Three Mycobacterial DNA Extraction Methods from Extrapulmonary Samples for PCR Assay\",\"authors\":\"K. Shadia, S. Anwar, S. Banu, A. Saleh, R. Miah\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/IMCJ.V6I1.14711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sensitivity of the molecular diagnostic tests of extrapulmonary tuberculosis largely depends upon the efficiency of DNA extraction methods. The objective of our study was to compare three methods of extracting DNA of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for testing by polymerase chain reaction. All three methods; heating, heating with sonication and addition of lysis buffer with heating and sonication were implicated on 20 extrapulmonary samples. PCR positivity was 2 (10%), 4 (20%) and 7 (35%) in the samples extracted by heating, heat+sonication and heat+sonication+lysis buffer method respectively. Of the extraction methods evaluated, maximum PCR positive results were achieved by combined heat, sonication and lysis buffer method which can be applied in routine clinical practice. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/imcj.v6i1.14711 Ibrahim Med. Coll. J. 2012; 6(1): 9-11\",\"PeriodicalId\":226732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ibrahim Medical College Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ibrahim Medical College Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/IMCJ.V6I1.14711\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ibrahim Medical College Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/IMCJ.V6I1.14711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

肺外结核分子诊断试验的敏感性在很大程度上取决于DNA提取方法的效率。本研究的目的是比较三种提取结核分枝杆菌DNA用于聚合酶链反应检测的方法。三种方法;对20例肺外样本进行了加热、超声加热和加溶解缓冲液加热和超声。加热、热+超声和热+超声+裂解缓冲液提取的样品PCR阳性分别为2例(10%)、4例(20%)和7例(35%)。在评价的提取方法中,热-超声-裂解缓冲法PCR阳性结果最高,可用于常规临床实践。DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/imcj.v6i1.14711 Ibrahim Med. col。j . 2012;6 (1): 9 - 11
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Three Mycobacterial DNA Extraction Methods from Extrapulmonary Samples for PCR Assay
Sensitivity of the molecular diagnostic tests of extrapulmonary tuberculosis largely depends upon the efficiency of DNA extraction methods. The objective of our study was to compare three methods of extracting DNA of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for testing by polymerase chain reaction. All three methods; heating, heating with sonication and addition of lysis buffer with heating and sonication were implicated on 20 extrapulmonary samples. PCR positivity was 2 (10%), 4 (20%) and 7 (35%) in the samples extracted by heating, heat+sonication and heat+sonication+lysis buffer method respectively. Of the extraction methods evaluated, maximum PCR positive results were achieved by combined heat, sonication and lysis buffer method which can be applied in routine clinical practice. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/imcj.v6i1.14711 Ibrahim Med. Coll. J. 2012; 6(1): 9-11
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信