论语用学逻辑中的断言与否定

Q1 Mathematics
Massimiliano Carrara , Daniele Chiffi , Ciro De Florio
{"title":"论语用学逻辑中的断言与否定","authors":"Massimiliano Carrara ,&nbsp;Daniele Chiffi ,&nbsp;Ciro De Florio","doi":"10.1016/j.jal.2017.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this paper is twofold: First, we present and develop a system of logic for pragmatics including the act of <em>denial</em>. Second, we analyse in our framework the so-called paradox of assertability. We show that it is possible to yield sentences that are not assertable. Moreover, under certain conditions, a symmetric result can be obtained: There is a specular paradox of deniability. However, this paradox is based on the problematic principle of classical denial equivalence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Logic","volume":"25 ","pages":"Pages S97-S107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jal.2017.11.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On assertion and denial in the logic for pragmatics\",\"authors\":\"Massimiliano Carrara ,&nbsp;Daniele Chiffi ,&nbsp;Ciro De Florio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jal.2017.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of this paper is twofold: First, we present and develop a system of logic for pragmatics including the act of <em>denial</em>. Second, we analyse in our framework the so-called paradox of assertability. We show that it is possible to yield sentences that are not assertable. Moreover, under certain conditions, a symmetric result can be obtained: There is a specular paradox of deniability. However, this paradox is based on the problematic principle of classical denial equivalence.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Logic\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"Pages S97-S107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jal.2017.11.002\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570868317300629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570868317300629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的有两个:首先,我们提出并发展了一个包括否认行为在内的语用学逻辑系统。其次,我们在我们的框架中分析所谓的可断言性悖论。我们证明了产生不可断言的句子是可能的。并且,在一定条件下,可以得到一个对称的结果:存在可否认性的镜面悖论。然而,这一悖论是建立在有问题的经典否定等效原则的基础上的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On assertion and denial in the logic for pragmatics

The aim of this paper is twofold: First, we present and develop a system of logic for pragmatics including the act of denial. Second, we analyse in our framework the so-called paradox of assertability. We show that it is possible to yield sentences that are not assertable. Moreover, under certain conditions, a symmetric result can be obtained: There is a specular paradox of deniability. However, this paradox is based on the problematic principle of classical denial equivalence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Logic
Journal of Applied Logic COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
CiteScore
1.13
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cessation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信