重要吗?不同吗?特殊的吗?图书贸易与Covid-19

C. Squires
{"title":"重要吗?不同吗?特殊的吗?图书贸易与Covid-19","authors":"C. Squires","doi":"10.16995/c21.3447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The lockdown conditions enforced by Covid-19 in 2020 have affected the book trade as with all other sectors of cultural, social and economic life. This commentary addresses claims to bookshops being ‘essential’ (and hence should remain open alongside other essential retailers and services), and sets them alongside prior claims of books as ‘different’ to mass-produced consumer goods. The commentary see these two claims as stemming from a narrative of book trade exceptionalism, which sit ill at ease with the urgencies of global pandemic, while also demonstrating some of the longer-term infrastructural challenges of the publishing industry, including the amount of economic and algorithmic power held by Amazon. The commentary calls for a reconsideration of how some of the values we might claim to have learned from books enable us to show solidarity to other sectors of cultural life, and society more generally.","PeriodicalId":272809,"journal":{"name":"C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-Century Writings","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Essential? Different? Exceptional? The Book Trade and Covid-19\",\"authors\":\"C. Squires\",\"doi\":\"10.16995/c21.3447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The lockdown conditions enforced by Covid-19 in 2020 have affected the book trade as with all other sectors of cultural, social and economic life. This commentary addresses claims to bookshops being ‘essential’ (and hence should remain open alongside other essential retailers and services), and sets them alongside prior claims of books as ‘different’ to mass-produced consumer goods. The commentary see these two claims as stemming from a narrative of book trade exceptionalism, which sit ill at ease with the urgencies of global pandemic, while also demonstrating some of the longer-term infrastructural challenges of the publishing industry, including the amount of economic and algorithmic power held by Amazon. The commentary calls for a reconsideration of how some of the values we might claim to have learned from books enable us to show solidarity to other sectors of cultural life, and society more generally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-Century Writings\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-Century Writings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16995/c21.3447\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-Century Writings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/c21.3447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2020年新冠肺炎疫情实施的封锁条件影响了图书贸易,也影响了文化、社会和经济生活的所有其他领域。这篇评论论述了书店是“必要的”(因此应该与其他必要的零售商和服务一起开放)的说法,并将它们与之前关于书籍与大规模生产的消费品“不同”的说法放在一起。评论认为,这两种说法源于一种图书行业例外论的说法,这种说法与全球流行病的紧迫性格格不入,同时也表明了出版业面临的一些长期基础设施挑战,包括亚马逊(Amazon)所拥有的经济和算法实力。这篇评论呼吁我们重新思考,我们可能声称从书籍中学到的一些价值观是如何使我们能够与文化生活的其他部门以及更广泛的社会表现出团结一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Essential? Different? Exceptional? The Book Trade and Covid-19
The lockdown conditions enforced by Covid-19 in 2020 have affected the book trade as with all other sectors of cultural, social and economic life. This commentary addresses claims to bookshops being ‘essential’ (and hence should remain open alongside other essential retailers and services), and sets them alongside prior claims of books as ‘different’ to mass-produced consumer goods. The commentary see these two claims as stemming from a narrative of book trade exceptionalism, which sit ill at ease with the urgencies of global pandemic, while also demonstrating some of the longer-term infrastructural challenges of the publishing industry, including the amount of economic and algorithmic power held by Amazon. The commentary calls for a reconsideration of how some of the values we might claim to have learned from books enable us to show solidarity to other sectors of cultural life, and society more generally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信