瑜珈是治疗腰痛的有效方法

Johnston Green A
{"title":"瑜珈是治疗腰痛的有效方法","authors":"Johnston Green A","doi":"10.33552/wjypr.2019.01.000522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Independently, two reviewers appraised the caliber and composition of each article while employing a third review if needed to reach an agreement in case of disparity in evaluation results. The 12 criteria suggested by the Cochrane Back Review Group in the 2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews were employed by the reviewers. Each item was rated as yes, no, or unclear. To be designated as having low risk of bias, a study had to achieve at least 6 of 12 criteria without possessing a serious flaw. Outcome assessment was determined to be shortterm if performed close to 12 weeks post-intervention. Long-term assessment was deemed to be follow-up close to 12 months after the treatment. This systematic review had the reviewers extract data which included participant characteristics, control conditions, interventions, co-interventions, outcome measures, and results. Main Results","PeriodicalId":233801,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Yoga, Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digest Review of Yoga as an Effective Treatment for those with Low Back Pain\",\"authors\":\"Johnston Green A\",\"doi\":\"10.33552/wjypr.2019.01.000522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Independently, two reviewers appraised the caliber and composition of each article while employing a third review if needed to reach an agreement in case of disparity in evaluation results. The 12 criteria suggested by the Cochrane Back Review Group in the 2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews were employed by the reviewers. Each item was rated as yes, no, or unclear. To be designated as having low risk of bias, a study had to achieve at least 6 of 12 criteria without possessing a serious flaw. Outcome assessment was determined to be shortterm if performed close to 12 weeks post-intervention. Long-term assessment was deemed to be follow-up close to 12 months after the treatment. This systematic review had the reviewers extract data which included participant characteristics, control conditions, interventions, co-interventions, outcome measures, and results. Main Results\",\"PeriodicalId\":233801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Yoga, Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Yoga, Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33552/wjypr.2019.01.000522\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Yoga, Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/wjypr.2019.01.000522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

两名审稿人独立地对每篇文章的质量和组成进行评估,如果评估结果存在差异,则需要进行第三次评估以达成一致。采用Cochrane Back Review Group在2009年《系统评价方法更新指南》中提出的12项标准。每个项目被评为是,否,或不清楚。要被指定为低偏倚风险,一项研究必须在没有严重缺陷的情况下达到12项标准中的至少6项。如果在干预后近12周进行结果评估,则确定为短期评估。长期评估被认为是治疗后近12个月的随访。本系统综述要求审稿人提取数据,包括参与者特征、对照条件、干预措施、联合干预措施、结局测量和结果。主要结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digest Review of Yoga as an Effective Treatment for those with Low Back Pain
Independently, two reviewers appraised the caliber and composition of each article while employing a third review if needed to reach an agreement in case of disparity in evaluation results. The 12 criteria suggested by the Cochrane Back Review Group in the 2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews were employed by the reviewers. Each item was rated as yes, no, or unclear. To be designated as having low risk of bias, a study had to achieve at least 6 of 12 criteria without possessing a serious flaw. Outcome assessment was determined to be shortterm if performed close to 12 weeks post-intervention. Long-term assessment was deemed to be follow-up close to 12 months after the treatment. This systematic review had the reviewers extract data which included participant characteristics, control conditions, interventions, co-interventions, outcome measures, and results. Main Results
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信