{"title":"一种分类器性能测试方法的比较:支持向量机分类器在乳房x光图像分类上的应用","authors":"S. J. Mohammed, Thekra Abbas","doi":"10.31642/JOKMC/2018/060102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"— This paper compares between testing performance methods of classifier algorithm on a standard database of mammogram images. Mammographic interchange society dataset (MIAS) is used in this work. For classifying these images tumors a multiclass support vector machine (SVM) classifier is used. Evaluating this classifier accuracy for classifying the mammogram tumors into the malignant, benign or normal case is done using two evaluating classifier methods that are a hold-out method and one of the cross-validation methods. Then selecting the better test method depending on the obtained classifier accuracy and the running time consumed with each method. The classifier accuracy, training time and the classification time are considered for comparison purpose.","PeriodicalId":115908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kufa for Mathematics and Computer","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of a Classifier Performance Testing Methods: Support Vector Machine Classifier on Mammogram Images Classification\",\"authors\":\"S. J. Mohammed, Thekra Abbas\",\"doi\":\"10.31642/JOKMC/2018/060102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"— This paper compares between testing performance methods of classifier algorithm on a standard database of mammogram images. Mammographic interchange society dataset (MIAS) is used in this work. For classifying these images tumors a multiclass support vector machine (SVM) classifier is used. Evaluating this classifier accuracy for classifying the mammogram tumors into the malignant, benign or normal case is done using two evaluating classifier methods that are a hold-out method and one of the cross-validation methods. Then selecting the better test method depending on the obtained classifier accuracy and the running time consumed with each method. The classifier accuracy, training time and the classification time are considered for comparison purpose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Kufa for Mathematics and Computer\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Kufa for Mathematics and Computer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31642/JOKMC/2018/060102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Kufa for Mathematics and Computer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31642/JOKMC/2018/060102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of a Classifier Performance Testing Methods: Support Vector Machine Classifier on Mammogram Images Classification
— This paper compares between testing performance methods of classifier algorithm on a standard database of mammogram images. Mammographic interchange society dataset (MIAS) is used in this work. For classifying these images tumors a multiclass support vector machine (SVM) classifier is used. Evaluating this classifier accuracy for classifying the mammogram tumors into the malignant, benign or normal case is done using two evaluating classifier methods that are a hold-out method and one of the cross-validation methods. Then selecting the better test method depending on the obtained classifier accuracy and the running time consumed with each method. The classifier accuracy, training time and the classification time are considered for comparison purpose.