无载波幅相调制(CAP)和离散多音调制(DMT)的比较

2014 IEEE 5th International Conference on Photonics (ICP) Pub Date : 2014-09-01 DOI:10.1109/ICP.2014.7002359

M. Othman, T. Pham, X. Zhang, L. Deng, J. Jensen, I. Monroy

{"title":"无载波幅相调制(CAP)和离散多音调制(DMT)的比较","authors":"M. Othman, T. Pham, X. Zhang, L. Deng, J. Jensen, I. Monroy","doi":"10.1109/ICP.2014.7002359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compare the transmission of 1.25 Gb/s CAP-16 and 909.2 Mb/s 16-QAM-DMT modulation formats over 2.4 km of MMF with 850 nm DM-CSELs. CAP displays 0.7-1.1 dB better sensitivity than DMT in this experiment.","PeriodicalId":282572,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 5th International Conference on Photonics (ICP)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of carrierless amplitude-phase (CAP) and discrete multitone (DMT) modulation\",\"authors\":\"M. Othman, T. Pham, X. Zhang, L. Deng, J. Jensen, I. Monroy\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICP.2014.7002359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We compare the transmission of 1.25 Gb/s CAP-16 and 909.2 Mb/s 16-QAM-DMT modulation formats over 2.4 km of MMF with 850 nm DM-CSELs. CAP displays 0.7-1.1 dB better sensitivity than DMT in this experiment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":282572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE 5th International Conference on Photonics (ICP)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE 5th International Conference on Photonics (ICP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICP.2014.7002359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 5th International Conference on Photonics (ICP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICP.2014.7002359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

摘要

我们比较了1.25 Gb/s CAP-16和909.2 Mb/s 16-QAM-DMT调制格式在2.4 km MMF上与850 nm dm - csel的传输。在本实验中，CAP的灵敏度比DMT高0.7-1.1 dB。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comparison of carrierless amplitude-phase (CAP) and discrete multitone (DMT) modulation

We compare the transmission of 1.25 Gb/s CAP-16 and 909.2 Mb/s 16-QAM-DMT modulation formats over 2.4 km of MMF with 850 nm DM-CSELs. CAP displays 0.7-1.1 dB better sensitivity than DMT in this experiment.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2014 IEEE 5th International Conference on Photonics (ICP)

自引率

0.00%

发文量