[局麻颌面外科手术清醒镇静两种方法的比较]。

Deutsche zahnarztliche Zeitschrift Pub Date : 1992-01-01
J Zöller, B Zöller, S Hassfeld, J Köhler
{"title":"[局麻颌面外科手术清醒镇静两种方法的比较]。","authors":"J Zöller,&nbsp;B Zöller,&nbsp;S Hassfeld,&nbsp;J Köhler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A randomised, prospective study was conducted to compare the efficiency and safety of methods for intravenous conscious sedation in patients undergoing oral surgery under local analgesia. 150 systemically healthy patients (ASA Class I and II) participated. Three groups were formed: group 1 received 0.05 mg/kg midazolam; group 2 0.05 mg/kg midazolam, 1.5 mg/kg tramadol, 50 mg alizaprid; group 3 0.05 mg/kg midazolam, 0.2 mg/kg nalbuphine, 50 mg alizaprid. Blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation were measured throughout the procedure. The results confirmed that the use of nalbuphine (group 3) allows a reduction in the mean dosage of midazolam required to produce satisfactory sedation and effected a more rapid recovery time compared to group 12 and 2. With the combination nalbuphine and alizaprid nausea and vomiting could be reduced for the most part compared to group 2.</p>","PeriodicalId":11244,"journal":{"name":"Deutsche zahnarztliche Zeitschrift","volume":"47 1","pages":"63-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comparison of two methods for conscious sedation in maxillofacial surgery with local anesthesia].\",\"authors\":\"J Zöller,&nbsp;B Zöller,&nbsp;S Hassfeld,&nbsp;J Köhler\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A randomised, prospective study was conducted to compare the efficiency and safety of methods for intravenous conscious sedation in patients undergoing oral surgery under local analgesia. 150 systemically healthy patients (ASA Class I and II) participated. Three groups were formed: group 1 received 0.05 mg/kg midazolam; group 2 0.05 mg/kg midazolam, 1.5 mg/kg tramadol, 50 mg alizaprid; group 3 0.05 mg/kg midazolam, 0.2 mg/kg nalbuphine, 50 mg alizaprid. Blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation were measured throughout the procedure. The results confirmed that the use of nalbuphine (group 3) allows a reduction in the mean dosage of midazolam required to produce satisfactory sedation and effected a more rapid recovery time compared to group 12 and 2. With the combination nalbuphine and alizaprid nausea and vomiting could be reduced for the most part compared to group 2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deutsche zahnarztliche Zeitschrift\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"63-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deutsche zahnarztliche Zeitschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsche zahnarztliche Zeitschrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一项随机、前瞻性研究比较了在局部镇痛的口腔手术患者中静脉清醒镇静的有效性和安全性。150例全身健康患者(ASA I级和II级)参与研究。分为三组:第一组给予0.05 mg/kg咪达唑仑;2组咪达唑仑0.05 mg/kg、曲马多1.5 mg/kg、阿里扎普利50 mg;第三组咪达唑仑0.05 mg/kg,纳布啡0.2 mg/kg,阿里扎普利50 mg。在整个过程中测量血压、心率和血氧饱和度。结果证实,与第12组和第2组相比,使用纳布啡(第3组)可以减少产生满意镇静所需的咪达唑仑的平均剂量,并且恢复时间更快。与第2组相比,纳布啡与阿里扎普利联合用药可减轻大部分恶心呕吐症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Comparison of two methods for conscious sedation in maxillofacial surgery with local anesthesia].

A randomised, prospective study was conducted to compare the efficiency and safety of methods for intravenous conscious sedation in patients undergoing oral surgery under local analgesia. 150 systemically healthy patients (ASA Class I and II) participated. Three groups were formed: group 1 received 0.05 mg/kg midazolam; group 2 0.05 mg/kg midazolam, 1.5 mg/kg tramadol, 50 mg alizaprid; group 3 0.05 mg/kg midazolam, 0.2 mg/kg nalbuphine, 50 mg alizaprid. Blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation were measured throughout the procedure. The results confirmed that the use of nalbuphine (group 3) allows a reduction in the mean dosage of midazolam required to produce satisfactory sedation and effected a more rapid recovery time compared to group 12 and 2. With the combination nalbuphine and alizaprid nausea and vomiting could be reduced for the most part compared to group 2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信