被排除在聚会之外

Laurel Elder
{"title":"被排除在聚会之外","authors":"Laurel Elder","doi":"10.18574/nyu/9781479804818.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on interviews and other qualitative data, chapter 4 argues that the Democratic Party’s more open and decentralized culture has allowed party elites and the party’s organizational structure to more easily accommodate demands for political equality from women and to develop a much more integrated relationship with an extended network of groups committed to electing more women. In contrast, the Republican Party’s hierarchical, top-down culture, which embraces individualism, rejects group-based claims, and holds a strong commitment to gender-neutral recruiting, has made it very difficult for the party and its extended network to recruit women candidates. There is also a self-reinforcing dynamic at work. Women in elective office tend to be more committed than men to the idea that recruiting more women is a priority, and also tend to have more women in their social networks, where much recruitment takes place. This holds true for women in both parties, but with each passing election cycle, there are quite simply more Democratic women than Republican women in positions to carry out this recruitment work.","PeriodicalId":446212,"journal":{"name":"The Partisan Gap","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left Out of the Party\",\"authors\":\"Laurel Elder\",\"doi\":\"10.18574/nyu/9781479804818.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drawing on interviews and other qualitative data, chapter 4 argues that the Democratic Party’s more open and decentralized culture has allowed party elites and the party’s organizational structure to more easily accommodate demands for political equality from women and to develop a much more integrated relationship with an extended network of groups committed to electing more women. In contrast, the Republican Party’s hierarchical, top-down culture, which embraces individualism, rejects group-based claims, and holds a strong commitment to gender-neutral recruiting, has made it very difficult for the party and its extended network to recruit women candidates. There is also a self-reinforcing dynamic at work. Women in elective office tend to be more committed than men to the idea that recruiting more women is a priority, and also tend to have more women in their social networks, where much recruitment takes place. This holds true for women in both parties, but with each passing election cycle, there are quite simply more Democratic women than Republican women in positions to carry out this recruitment work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":446212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Partisan Gap\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Partisan Gap\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479804818.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Partisan Gap","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479804818.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据访谈和其他定性数据,第四章认为民主党更加开放和分散的文化使得党内精英和该党的组织结构更容易适应女性对政治平等的要求,并与致力于选举更多女性的团体的扩展网络发展出更加一体化的关系。相比之下,共和党的等级制度,自上而下的文化,信奉个人主义,拒绝基于群体的主张,并坚持性别中立的强烈承诺,使得该党及其扩展网络很难招募女性候选人。还有一种自我强化的动力在起作用。竞选公职的女性往往比男性更坚定地认为,招聘更多女性是优先事项,她们的社交网络中也往往有更多女性,而社交网络中有很多招聘活动。这对两党中的女性都适用,但随着每一个选举周期的过去,民主党的女性比共和党的女性更多地担任这项招募工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Left Out of the Party
Drawing on interviews and other qualitative data, chapter 4 argues that the Democratic Party’s more open and decentralized culture has allowed party elites and the party’s organizational structure to more easily accommodate demands for political equality from women and to develop a much more integrated relationship with an extended network of groups committed to electing more women. In contrast, the Republican Party’s hierarchical, top-down culture, which embraces individualism, rejects group-based claims, and holds a strong commitment to gender-neutral recruiting, has made it very difficult for the party and its extended network to recruit women candidates. There is also a self-reinforcing dynamic at work. Women in elective office tend to be more committed than men to the idea that recruiting more women is a priority, and also tend to have more women in their social networks, where much recruitment takes place. This holds true for women in both parties, but with each passing election cycle, there are quite simply more Democratic women than Republican women in positions to carry out this recruitment work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信