使用模态逻辑对代理群体建模

Burge, A. Esterline
{"title":"使用模态逻辑对代理群体建模","authors":"Burge, A. Esterline","doi":"10.1109/SECON.2000.845429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Presents a framework that shows how epistemic logic and deontic logic can be used to model a multi-agent system consisting of humans and non-human agents. Modeling agents with epistemic and deontic logic also captures the interdependencies between human and non-human agents. Epistemic logic addresses belief and knowledge (notably common knowledge), and, in many applications in computer science, it specifically addresses knowledge acquired by communication. With deontic logic, we represent obligations, prohibitions and permissions applying to agents. Axioms and rules of inference represent a deductive system for modal logics, and Kripke structures furnish semantic models in which propositions are evaluated to true or false. We are concerned with agents' actions, their attitudes and what they know. Our framework emphasizes the ability to maintain ongoing relationships among agents. Such a system is called reactive. We contrast a reactive system with a transformational system, which, given a set of inputs, produces outputs upon program termination. In developing this framework, we address the concepts of a multi-agent/multi-human collaboration.","PeriodicalId":206022,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the IEEE SoutheastCon 2000. 'Preparing for The New Millennium' (Cat. No.00CH37105)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling societies of agents using modal logics\",\"authors\":\"Burge, A. Esterline\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SECON.2000.845429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Presents a framework that shows how epistemic logic and deontic logic can be used to model a multi-agent system consisting of humans and non-human agents. Modeling agents with epistemic and deontic logic also captures the interdependencies between human and non-human agents. Epistemic logic addresses belief and knowledge (notably common knowledge), and, in many applications in computer science, it specifically addresses knowledge acquired by communication. With deontic logic, we represent obligations, prohibitions and permissions applying to agents. Axioms and rules of inference represent a deductive system for modal logics, and Kripke structures furnish semantic models in which propositions are evaluated to true or false. We are concerned with agents' actions, their attitudes and what they know. Our framework emphasizes the ability to maintain ongoing relationships among agents. Such a system is called reactive. We contrast a reactive system with a transformational system, which, given a set of inputs, produces outputs upon program termination. In developing this framework, we address the concepts of a multi-agent/multi-human collaboration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the IEEE SoutheastCon 2000. 'Preparing for The New Millennium' (Cat. No.00CH37105)\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the IEEE SoutheastCon 2000. 'Preparing for The New Millennium' (Cat. No.00CH37105)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON.2000.845429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the IEEE SoutheastCon 2000. 'Preparing for The New Millennium' (Cat. No.00CH37105)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON.2000.845429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提出了一个框架,展示了如何使用认知逻辑和道义逻辑来建模由人类和非人类代理组成的多代理系统。用认知逻辑和道义逻辑建模代理还可以捕获人类和非人类代理之间的相互依赖关系。认知逻辑处理信念和知识(特别是常识),在计算机科学的许多应用中,它特别处理通过交流获得的知识。使用道义逻辑,我们表示适用于代理的义务、禁止和许可。公理和推理规则代表了模态逻辑的演绎系统,Kripke结构提供了命题评估为真或假的语义模型。我们关心的是代理人的行为,他们的态度和他们所知道的。我们的框架强调维持代理之间持续关系的能力。这样的系统被称为反应性系统。我们将反应系统与转换系统进行对比,后者在给定一组输入后,在程序终止时产生输出。在开发这个框架时,我们处理了多代理/多人协作的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modeling societies of agents using modal logics
Presents a framework that shows how epistemic logic and deontic logic can be used to model a multi-agent system consisting of humans and non-human agents. Modeling agents with epistemic and deontic logic also captures the interdependencies between human and non-human agents. Epistemic logic addresses belief and knowledge (notably common knowledge), and, in many applications in computer science, it specifically addresses knowledge acquired by communication. With deontic logic, we represent obligations, prohibitions and permissions applying to agents. Axioms and rules of inference represent a deductive system for modal logics, and Kripke structures furnish semantic models in which propositions are evaluated to true or false. We are concerned with agents' actions, their attitudes and what they know. Our framework emphasizes the ability to maintain ongoing relationships among agents. Such a system is called reactive. We contrast a reactive system with a transformational system, which, given a set of inputs, produces outputs upon program termination. In developing this framework, we address the concepts of a multi-agent/multi-human collaboration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信