业务流程模型的协作分组

Hugo Ordóñez, J. Corrales, Carlos Alberto Cobos Lozada, Leandro Krug Wives
{"title":"业务流程模型的协作分组","authors":"Hugo Ordóñez, J. Corrales, Carlos Alberto Cobos Lozada, Leandro Krug Wives","doi":"10.1145/2590651.2590686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a collaborative platform that allows a set of judges (evaluators) to form business process (BP) groups based on the relationship of a user's query with the BPs stored in a repository and the relevant results to that query. Queries are expressed as complete BP and are presented to the evaluators in order to allow them to form groups of BP taking into account similarity relationships. Additionally, each evaluator can compare the concordance or discordance of his results with relevance judgments issued by other evaluators; in this way evaluator can collaborate in the global evaluation process or change his evaluations. Results of the evaluation can be used to assess the quality of the results retrieved by an automatic BP similarity tool. The proposed platform was evaluated with a set of 54 users and results are promising.","PeriodicalId":165011,"journal":{"name":"Euro American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems","volume":"160 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaborative grouping of business process models\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Ordóñez, J. Corrales, Carlos Alberto Cobos Lozada, Leandro Krug Wives\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2590651.2590686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a collaborative platform that allows a set of judges (evaluators) to form business process (BP) groups based on the relationship of a user's query with the BPs stored in a repository and the relevant results to that query. Queries are expressed as complete BP and are presented to the evaluators in order to allow them to form groups of BP taking into account similarity relationships. Additionally, each evaluator can compare the concordance or discordance of his results with relevance judgments issued by other evaluators; in this way evaluator can collaborate in the global evaluation process or change his evaluations. Results of the evaluation can be used to assess the quality of the results retrieved by an automatic BP similarity tool. The proposed platform was evaluated with a set of 54 users and results are promising.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Euro American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems\",\"volume\":\"160 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Euro American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2590651.2590686\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Euro American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2590651.2590686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文提出了一个协作平台,该平台允许一组评审(评估者)根据存储在存储库中的用户查询与BP的关系以及该查询的相关结果组成业务流程(BP)组。查询被表示为完整的BP,并呈现给评估者,以便允许他们根据相似关系形成BP组。此外,每个评价者可以将其结果的一致性或不一致性与其他评价者发布的相关性判断进行比较;通过这种方式,评估者可以在整体评估过程中进行协作或更改其评估。评估结果可用于评估自动BP相似度工具检索结果的质量。对该平台进行了54个用户的评估,结果令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collaborative grouping of business process models
This paper presents a collaborative platform that allows a set of judges (evaluators) to form business process (BP) groups based on the relationship of a user's query with the BPs stored in a repository and the relevant results to that query. Queries are expressed as complete BP and are presented to the evaluators in order to allow them to form groups of BP taking into account similarity relationships. Additionally, each evaluator can compare the concordance or discordance of his results with relevance judgments issued by other evaluators; in this way evaluator can collaborate in the global evaluation process or change his evaluations. Results of the evaluation can be used to assess the quality of the results retrieved by an automatic BP similarity tool. The proposed platform was evaluated with a set of 54 users and results are promising.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信