骄傲

Jens GLEBE-MØLLER
{"title":"骄傲","authors":"Jens GLEBE-MØLLER","doi":"10.1515/semi.1997.117.2-4.333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A distinction should be made between 'capital sins' and 'mortal sins'. According to the English translation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, a capital sin is one that engenders other sins. As capital sins the Catechism then lists: pride, avarice, envy, wrath, lust, gluttony, and sloth or acedia (Catechism 1994: 411-412). This is, of course, more or less the familiar list of the Latin and medieval tradition which is known under the name of SALIGIA (superbia, avaritia, luxuria, invidia, gula, ira, acedia). A mortal sin, on the other hand, is defined as a 'sin whose object is grave matter and which is also committed with full knowledge and deliberate consent' (Catechism 1994: 410). Back in the early Middle Ages, or even before that, such a distinction became confused through the introduction of the sacrament of penance. One had to confess one's sins at least once a year, and in order to find a convenient classification, the list of the seven (or originally eight) capital sins was used. However, if one commits the sin of, say, gluttony without full knowledge and deliberate consent, even if it may engender other sins or vices, it is not as such a mortal sin. But in popular parlance the distinction has been blurred so that a capital sin and a mortal sin mean one and the same. Being a Protestant myself, I prefer to speak of capital sins, because otherwise I would be lured into a discussion of whether some sins are mortal and some only venial. But in either case, whether we speak of capital sins or mortal sins, the list is headed by pride or superbia, because — as St. Augustine has stated — 'the cause of all the human vices is pride'. And so, here in my article, we have come to the root sin, the sin that causes all the other sins that have been discussed so far. But before I embark upon a treatment of pride or superbia, I would like to reflect on the reasons why the seven capital and/or mortal sins were chosen as the subject for the conference on which this issue is based. I take it that semioticians are not especially interested in or perhaps not even familiar with the ethical or moral discussions of today. However, that they should choose such a topic as the seven capital sins may been","PeriodicalId":426705,"journal":{"name":"Out in Central Pennsylvania","volume":"15 12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pride\",\"authors\":\"Jens GLEBE-MØLLER\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/semi.1997.117.2-4.333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A distinction should be made between 'capital sins' and 'mortal sins'. According to the English translation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, a capital sin is one that engenders other sins. As capital sins the Catechism then lists: pride, avarice, envy, wrath, lust, gluttony, and sloth or acedia (Catechism 1994: 411-412). This is, of course, more or less the familiar list of the Latin and medieval tradition which is known under the name of SALIGIA (superbia, avaritia, luxuria, invidia, gula, ira, acedia). A mortal sin, on the other hand, is defined as a 'sin whose object is grave matter and which is also committed with full knowledge and deliberate consent' (Catechism 1994: 410). Back in the early Middle Ages, or even before that, such a distinction became confused through the introduction of the sacrament of penance. One had to confess one's sins at least once a year, and in order to find a convenient classification, the list of the seven (or originally eight) capital sins was used. However, if one commits the sin of, say, gluttony without full knowledge and deliberate consent, even if it may engender other sins or vices, it is not as such a mortal sin. But in popular parlance the distinction has been blurred so that a capital sin and a mortal sin mean one and the same. Being a Protestant myself, I prefer to speak of capital sins, because otherwise I would be lured into a discussion of whether some sins are mortal and some only venial. But in either case, whether we speak of capital sins or mortal sins, the list is headed by pride or superbia, because — as St. Augustine has stated — 'the cause of all the human vices is pride'. And so, here in my article, we have come to the root sin, the sin that causes all the other sins that have been discussed so far. But before I embark upon a treatment of pride or superbia, I would like to reflect on the reasons why the seven capital and/or mortal sins were chosen as the subject for the conference on which this issue is based. I take it that semioticians are not especially interested in or perhaps not even familiar with the ethical or moral discussions of today. However, that they should choose such a topic as the seven capital sins may been\",\"PeriodicalId\":426705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Out in Central Pennsylvania\",\"volume\":\"15 12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Out in Central Pennsylvania\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1997.117.2-4.333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Out in Central Pennsylvania","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1997.117.2-4.333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

应该区分“死罪”和“大罪”。根据天主教教理问答的英文翻译,原罪是导致其他罪的罪。在《教理问答》中列出的罪有:骄傲、贪婪、嫉妒、愤怒、欲望、贪食、懒惰或懒惰(《教理问答》1994:411-412)。当然,这或多或少是拉丁和中世纪传统的熟悉列表,以SALIGIA (superbia, avaritia, luxury, invidia, gula, ira, acedia)的名称而闻名。另一方面,大罪被定义为“罪行的目的是严重的,而且是在完全知情和故意同意的情况下犯下的”(天主教教理1994:410)。早在中世纪早期,甚至更早,这种区别就因为忏悔圣礼的引入而变得混乱。一个人必须每年至少忏悔一次自己的罪,为了找到一个方便的分类,使用了七宗罪(或最初的八宗)的清单。然而,如果一个人在没有充分的知识和故意同意的情况下犯了暴饮暴食的罪,即使它可能导致其他的罪恶或恶习,它也不是这样的大罪。但在流行的说法中,这种区别已经模糊了,以至于死罪和死罪的意思是一样的。作为一名新教徒,我更喜欢谈论死罪,因为否则我就会被引诱去讨论是否有些罪是致命的,而有些罪只是可赦的。但无论哪种情况,无论我们谈论的是死罪还是大罪,最重要的都是骄傲或傲慢,因为——正如圣奥古斯丁所说——“人类所有罪恶的根源都是骄傲”。因此,在我的文章中,我们来到了罪的根源,这个罪导致了到目前为止讨论过的所有其他罪。但在我开始谈论骄傲或傲慢之前,我想反思一下为什么七宗罪和/或大罪被选为这个问题所依据的会议的主题。我认为符号学家对今天的伦理或道德讨论不是特别感兴趣,或者甚至不熟悉。然而,他们应该选择像七宗罪这样的话题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pride
A distinction should be made between 'capital sins' and 'mortal sins'. According to the English translation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, a capital sin is one that engenders other sins. As capital sins the Catechism then lists: pride, avarice, envy, wrath, lust, gluttony, and sloth or acedia (Catechism 1994: 411-412). This is, of course, more or less the familiar list of the Latin and medieval tradition which is known under the name of SALIGIA (superbia, avaritia, luxuria, invidia, gula, ira, acedia). A mortal sin, on the other hand, is defined as a 'sin whose object is grave matter and which is also committed with full knowledge and deliberate consent' (Catechism 1994: 410). Back in the early Middle Ages, or even before that, such a distinction became confused through the introduction of the sacrament of penance. One had to confess one's sins at least once a year, and in order to find a convenient classification, the list of the seven (or originally eight) capital sins was used. However, if one commits the sin of, say, gluttony without full knowledge and deliberate consent, even if it may engender other sins or vices, it is not as such a mortal sin. But in popular parlance the distinction has been blurred so that a capital sin and a mortal sin mean one and the same. Being a Protestant myself, I prefer to speak of capital sins, because otherwise I would be lured into a discussion of whether some sins are mortal and some only venial. But in either case, whether we speak of capital sins or mortal sins, the list is headed by pride or superbia, because — as St. Augustine has stated — 'the cause of all the human vices is pride'. And so, here in my article, we have come to the root sin, the sin that causes all the other sins that have been discussed so far. But before I embark upon a treatment of pride or superbia, I would like to reflect on the reasons why the seven capital and/or mortal sins were chosen as the subject for the conference on which this issue is based. I take it that semioticians are not especially interested in or perhaps not even familiar with the ethical or moral discussions of today. However, that they should choose such a topic as the seven capital sins may been
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信