用UTA和ACUTA方法逼近DEX效用函数

M. Mihelčić, M. Bohanec
{"title":"用UTA和ACUTA方法逼近DEX效用函数","authors":"M. Mihelčić, M. Bohanec","doi":"10.6025/ISEJ/2019/6/1/1-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DEX is a qualitative multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method, aimed at supporting decision makers in evaluating and choosing decision alternatives. We present results of a preliminary study in which we experimentally assessed the performance of two wellknown MCDA methods UTA and ACUTA to approximate qualitative DEX utility functions with piecewise-linear marginal utility functions. This is seen as a way to improve the sensitivity of qualitative models and provide a better insight in DEX utility functions. The results indicate that the approach is in principle feasible, but at this stage suffers from problems of convergence, insufficient sensitivity and inappropriate handling of symmetric functions.","PeriodicalId":140458,"journal":{"name":"Information Security Education Journal (ISEJ)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approximating DEX Utility Functions with Methods UTA and ACUTA\",\"authors\":\"M. Mihelčić, M. Bohanec\",\"doi\":\"10.6025/ISEJ/2019/6/1/1-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"DEX is a qualitative multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method, aimed at supporting decision makers in evaluating and choosing decision alternatives. We present results of a preliminary study in which we experimentally assessed the performance of two wellknown MCDA methods UTA and ACUTA to approximate qualitative DEX utility functions with piecewise-linear marginal utility functions. This is seen as a way to improve the sensitivity of qualitative models and provide a better insight in DEX utility functions. The results indicate that the approach is in principle feasible, but at this stage suffers from problems of convergence, insufficient sensitivity and inappropriate handling of symmetric functions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":140458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Security Education Journal (ISEJ)\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Security Education Journal (ISEJ)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6025/ISEJ/2019/6/1/1-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Security Education Journal (ISEJ)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6025/ISEJ/2019/6/1/1-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

DEX是一种定性的多准则决策分析(MCDA)方法,旨在支持决策者评估和选择决策方案。我们提出了一项初步研究的结果,在该研究中,我们实验评估了两种著名的MCDA方法UTA和ACUTA的性能,以分段线性边际效用函数近似定性DEX效用函数。这被视为提高定性模型灵敏度的一种方法,并提供了对DEX效用函数的更好见解。结果表明,该方法在原则上是可行的,但在现阶段存在收敛性、灵敏度不足和对称函数处理不当等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Approximating DEX Utility Functions with Methods UTA and ACUTA
DEX is a qualitative multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method, aimed at supporting decision makers in evaluating and choosing decision alternatives. We present results of a preliminary study in which we experimentally assessed the performance of two wellknown MCDA methods UTA and ACUTA to approximate qualitative DEX utility functions with piecewise-linear marginal utility functions. This is seen as a way to improve the sensitivity of qualitative models and provide a better insight in DEX utility functions. The results indicate that the approach is in principle feasible, but at this stage suffers from problems of convergence, insufficient sensitivity and inappropriate handling of symmetric functions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信