从18世纪至19世纪中期伦敦人骨中提取DNA的硅基方法的比较

Abigail S. Bouwman, T. Brown
{"title":"从18世纪至19世纪中期伦敦人骨中提取DNA的硅基方法的比较","authors":"Abigail S. Bouwman, T. Brown","doi":"10.1080/1358612021000028470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compared five silica-based methods for their efficiency at extracting DNA from human bones from 18th to mid-19th century London. Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were directed at two mitochondrial and one nuclear loci. Methods that used commercially available silica columns were more efficient than methods that used a silica slurry. Extraction with Qiagen QIAquick columns and the Qiagen QIAamp DNA Mini Kit were equally efficient, though we recommend the former as this method involves fewer steps.","PeriodicalId":428796,"journal":{"name":"Ancient Biomolecules","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between silica-based methods for the extraction of DNA from human bones from 18th–mid-19th century London\",\"authors\":\"Abigail S. Bouwman, T. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1358612021000028470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We compared five silica-based methods for their efficiency at extracting DNA from human bones from 18th to mid-19th century London. Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were directed at two mitochondrial and one nuclear loci. Methods that used commercially available silica columns were more efficient than methods that used a silica slurry. Extraction with Qiagen QIAquick columns and the Qiagen QIAamp DNA Mini Kit were equally efficient, though we recommend the former as this method involves fewer steps.\",\"PeriodicalId\":428796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ancient Biomolecules\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ancient Biomolecules\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1358612021000028470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ancient Biomolecules","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1358612021000028470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

我们比较了从18世纪到19世纪中期的伦敦人类骨骼中提取DNA的五种基于硅的方法的效率。聚合酶链反应(pcr)针对两个线粒体和一个核位点。使用市售硅柱的方法比使用硅浆的方法更有效。Qiagen QIAquick色谱柱和Qiagen QIAamp DNA Mini Kit的提取效率相同,但我们推荐前者,因为该方法涉及的步骤较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between silica-based methods for the extraction of DNA from human bones from 18th–mid-19th century London
We compared five silica-based methods for their efficiency at extracting DNA from human bones from 18th to mid-19th century London. Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were directed at two mitochondrial and one nuclear loci. Methods that used commercially available silica columns were more efficient than methods that used a silica slurry. Extraction with Qiagen QIAquick columns and the Qiagen QIAamp DNA Mini Kit were equally efficient, though we recommend the former as this method involves fewer steps.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信