{"title":"从18世纪至19世纪中期伦敦人骨中提取DNA的硅基方法的比较","authors":"Abigail S. Bouwman, T. Brown","doi":"10.1080/1358612021000028470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compared five silica-based methods for their efficiency at extracting DNA from human bones from 18th to mid-19th century London. Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were directed at two mitochondrial and one nuclear loci. Methods that used commercially available silica columns were more efficient than methods that used a silica slurry. Extraction with Qiagen QIAquick columns and the Qiagen QIAamp DNA Mini Kit were equally efficient, though we recommend the former as this method involves fewer steps.","PeriodicalId":428796,"journal":{"name":"Ancient Biomolecules","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between silica-based methods for the extraction of DNA from human bones from 18th–mid-19th century London\",\"authors\":\"Abigail S. Bouwman, T. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1358612021000028470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We compared five silica-based methods for their efficiency at extracting DNA from human bones from 18th to mid-19th century London. Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were directed at two mitochondrial and one nuclear loci. Methods that used commercially available silica columns were more efficient than methods that used a silica slurry. Extraction with Qiagen QIAquick columns and the Qiagen QIAamp DNA Mini Kit were equally efficient, though we recommend the former as this method involves fewer steps.\",\"PeriodicalId\":428796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ancient Biomolecules\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ancient Biomolecules\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1358612021000028470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ancient Biomolecules","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1358612021000028470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30
摘要
我们比较了从18世纪到19世纪中期的伦敦人类骨骼中提取DNA的五种基于硅的方法的效率。聚合酶链反应(pcr)针对两个线粒体和一个核位点。使用市售硅柱的方法比使用硅浆的方法更有效。Qiagen QIAquick色谱柱和Qiagen QIAamp DNA Mini Kit的提取效率相同,但我们推荐前者,因为该方法涉及的步骤较少。
Comparison between silica-based methods for the extraction of DNA from human bones from 18th–mid-19th century London
We compared five silica-based methods for their efficiency at extracting DNA from human bones from 18th to mid-19th century London. Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were directed at two mitochondrial and one nuclear loci. Methods that used commercially available silica columns were more efficient than methods that used a silica slurry. Extraction with Qiagen QIAquick columns and the Qiagen QIAamp DNA Mini Kit were equally efficient, though we recommend the former as this method involves fewer steps.