{"title":"相互承认和欧洲自由贸易协定","authors":"Georges Baur","doi":"10.5040/9781509936663.CH-009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Th e decision in Cassis de Dijon 1 has had a profound eff ect on the advent of the EU ’ s single market. But has the eff ect spilled over to the EU ’ s closest neighbour, namely, to Member States of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) – Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland? Th ese four States are, now next to the United Kingdom (UK), economically and politically the EU ’ s closest partners. Th ey participate in, or have at least partial access to, the EU ’ s internal market. 2","PeriodicalId":217153,"journal":{"name":"Cassis de Dijon","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mutual Recognition and EFTA\",\"authors\":\"Georges Baur\",\"doi\":\"10.5040/9781509936663.CH-009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Th e decision in Cassis de Dijon 1 has had a profound eff ect on the advent of the EU ’ s single market. But has the eff ect spilled over to the EU ’ s closest neighbour, namely, to Member States of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) – Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland? Th ese four States are, now next to the United Kingdom (UK), economically and politically the EU ’ s closest partners. Th ey participate in, or have at least partial access to, the EU ’ s internal market. 2\",\"PeriodicalId\":217153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cassis de Dijon\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cassis de Dijon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509936663.CH-009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cassis de Dijon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509936663.CH-009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Th e decision in Cassis de Dijon 1 has had a profound eff ect on the advent of the EU ’ s single market. But has the eff ect spilled over to the EU ’ s closest neighbour, namely, to Member States of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) – Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland? Th ese four States are, now next to the United Kingdom (UK), economically and politically the EU ’ s closest partners. Th ey participate in, or have at least partial access to, the EU ’ s internal market. 2