Ari Páll Kristinsson
{"title":"Um greiningu á málstöðlun og málstefnu. Haugen, Ammon og Spolsky í íslensku samhengi","authors":"Ari Páll Kristinsson","doi":"10.33112/ORDOGTUNGA.21.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theoretical analyses and models by Haugen (1966), Ammon (2003, 2015) and Spolsky (2004, 2009, 2018) on language standardization, language policy and language management are described and discussed, along with some detailed accounts on how these have been or may be used in the study of Icelandic language tandardization and language policy at various points in the history of Icelandic. Furthermore, some advantages and shortcomings of these analyses are discussed in comparison with different theoretical approaches.","PeriodicalId":205730,"journal":{"name":"Orð og tunga","volume":"53 7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orð og tunga","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33112/ORDOGTUNGA.21.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Haugen(1966)、Ammon(2003、2015)和Spolsky(2004、2009、2018)对语言标准化、语言政策和语言管理的理论分析和模型进行了描述和讨论,并详细说明了这些理论分析和模型是如何或可能被用于冰岛历史上不同时期冰岛语言标准化和语言政策的研究。并与不同的理论方法进行了比较,讨论了这些分析方法的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Um greiningu á málstöðlun og málstefnu. Haugen, Ammon og Spolsky í íslensku samhengi
Theoretical analyses and models by Haugen (1966), Ammon (2003, 2015) and Spolsky (2004, 2009, 2018) on language standardization, language policy and language management are described and discussed, along with some detailed accounts on how these have been or may be used in the study of Icelandic language tandardization and language policy at various points in the history of Icelandic. Furthermore, some advantages and shortcomings of these analyses are discussed in comparison with different theoretical approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信