众包智慧城市:智慧台北计划

Helen K. Liu, Yu-Wei Guo, Liang-Yu Chen
{"title":"众包智慧城市:智慧台北计划","authors":"Helen K. Liu, Yu-Wei Guo, Liang-Yu Chen","doi":"10.1145/3598469.3598474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasingly governments engage the crowd through online platforms to generate innovation and utilize collaborative platforms for AI adoptions as a governance strategy. This study aims to investigate the factors associated with terminated and implemented smart city or AI related technologies projects through qualitative analysis. This study selected a setting based on the Taipei Smart City Industrial Field Experiment Pilot Program since 2016. We collected online achieved data of the smart city proposals from 2016 to April 2023 (N=295). Based on those achieved data with descriptions for termination and implementation, this paper discusses the opportunities, challenges, and suggestions for overcoming such challenges of the SmartTaipei Project. Given that governments do not provide financial support for smart city pilot projects, enterprises acquire opportunities to experiment with and thus improve their products or services. The successful experiment is conducive to research and development, business expansion, and even government procurement. However, despite the fact that the SmartTaipei proposals and projects have been discussed and modified several times before implementation, 41.7% of the projects were terminated due to several reasons. We classify the total number of AI technologies adopted across all projects. We also use the Technology Enactment Framework as the analysis framework to summarize the reason why nearly 41.7% of the project (N=123) were terminated. To address the challenges of building smart cities, this paper suggests that municipal governments (1) build up platforms for stakeholder participation and assess progressive results, (2) develop a comprehensive development strategy and enhance digital infrastructure, and (3) develop a convention for international exchange.","PeriodicalId":401026,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crowdsourcing Smart City: SmartTaipei Project\",\"authors\":\"Helen K. Liu, Yu-Wei Guo, Liang-Yu Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3598469.3598474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Increasingly governments engage the crowd through online platforms to generate innovation and utilize collaborative platforms for AI adoptions as a governance strategy. This study aims to investigate the factors associated with terminated and implemented smart city or AI related technologies projects through qualitative analysis. This study selected a setting based on the Taipei Smart City Industrial Field Experiment Pilot Program since 2016. We collected online achieved data of the smart city proposals from 2016 to April 2023 (N=295). Based on those achieved data with descriptions for termination and implementation, this paper discusses the opportunities, challenges, and suggestions for overcoming such challenges of the SmartTaipei Project. Given that governments do not provide financial support for smart city pilot projects, enterprises acquire opportunities to experiment with and thus improve their products or services. The successful experiment is conducive to research and development, business expansion, and even government procurement. However, despite the fact that the SmartTaipei proposals and projects have been discussed and modified several times before implementation, 41.7% of the projects were terminated due to several reasons. We classify the total number of AI technologies adopted across all projects. We also use the Technology Enactment Framework as the analysis framework to summarize the reason why nearly 41.7% of the project (N=123) were terminated. To address the challenges of building smart cities, this paper suggests that municipal governments (1) build up platforms for stakeholder participation and assess progressive results, (2) develop a comprehensive development strategy and enhance digital infrastructure, and (3) develop a convention for international exchange.\",\"PeriodicalId\":401026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598474\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政府越来越多地通过在线平台与公众互动,以产生创新,并利用协作平台将人工智能的采用作为一种治理策略。本研究旨在通过定性分析,探讨终止和实施智慧城市或人工智能相关技术项目的相关因素。本研究选取台北市自2016年起实施的智慧城市工业现场实验先导计划为背景。我们收集了2016年至2023年4月的智慧城市提案的在线实现数据(N=295)。本文根据已取得的数据,以及终止和实施的描述,讨论了智能台北项目的机遇、挑战以及克服这些挑战的建议。由于政府没有为智慧城市试点项目提供资金支持,企业获得了试验和改进产品或服务的机会。成功的实验有利于研发、业务拓展,甚至有利于政府采购。然而,尽管SmartTaipei的提案和项目在实施前经过多次讨论和修改,但41.7%的项目由于各种原因而终止。我们对所有项目中采用的人工智能技术的总数进行分类。我们还使用技术制定框架作为分析框架,总结了近41.7%的项目(N=123)终止的原因。为了应对智慧城市建设的挑战,本文建议市政府(1)建立利益相关者参与的平台并评估渐进结果;(2)制定综合发展战略并加强数字基础设施;(3)制定国际交流公约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Crowdsourcing Smart City: SmartTaipei Project
Increasingly governments engage the crowd through online platforms to generate innovation and utilize collaborative platforms for AI adoptions as a governance strategy. This study aims to investigate the factors associated with terminated and implemented smart city or AI related technologies projects through qualitative analysis. This study selected a setting based on the Taipei Smart City Industrial Field Experiment Pilot Program since 2016. We collected online achieved data of the smart city proposals from 2016 to April 2023 (N=295). Based on those achieved data with descriptions for termination and implementation, this paper discusses the opportunities, challenges, and suggestions for overcoming such challenges of the SmartTaipei Project. Given that governments do not provide financial support for smart city pilot projects, enterprises acquire opportunities to experiment with and thus improve their products or services. The successful experiment is conducive to research and development, business expansion, and even government procurement. However, despite the fact that the SmartTaipei proposals and projects have been discussed and modified several times before implementation, 41.7% of the projects were terminated due to several reasons. We classify the total number of AI technologies adopted across all projects. We also use the Technology Enactment Framework as the analysis framework to summarize the reason why nearly 41.7% of the project (N=123) were terminated. To address the challenges of building smart cities, this paper suggests that municipal governments (1) build up platforms for stakeholder participation and assess progressive results, (2) develop a comprehensive development strategy and enhance digital infrastructure, and (3) develop a convention for international exchange.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信