监管机构的规范性权力和最高法院对可理解原则的承认

A. Arigony
{"title":"监管机构的规范性权力和最高法院对可理解原则的承认","authors":"A. Arigony","doi":"10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regulatory agencies exercise normative power on the basis of legal norms that, in a broad and abstract way, provide for what the doctrine has agreed to call intelligible principles. The intelligible principles only establish parameters and objectives to be achieved by the regulatory agency. The legislator only fixes beacons to the regulatory agency, although broad, sometimes based only on standards. There is a certain tension of intelligible principles with the classical meaning of the principle of legality, which provides that Public Administration cannot have any room for creation. Thus, some administrative authors consider this legislative technique unconstitutional. They advocate a maximalist view of the law: administrative entities should only enforce the law. This article demonstrates that the use of intelligible principles is constitutional and in line with current reality, and that there are other control mechanisms of the Public Administration.","PeriodicalId":346094,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O poder normativo das agências reguladoras e o reconhecimento dos princípios inteligíveis pelo STF\",\"authors\":\"A. Arigony\",\"doi\":\"10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Regulatory agencies exercise normative power on the basis of legal norms that, in a broad and abstract way, provide for what the doctrine has agreed to call intelligible principles. The intelligible principles only establish parameters and objectives to be achieved by the regulatory agency. The legislator only fixes beacons to the regulatory agency, although broad, sometimes based only on standards. There is a certain tension of intelligible principles with the classical meaning of the principle of legality, which provides that Public Administration cannot have any room for creation. Thus, some administrative authors consider this legislative technique unconstitutional. They advocate a maximalist view of the law: administrative entities should only enforce the law. This article demonstrates that the use of intelligible principles is constitutional and in line with current reality, and that there are other control mechanisms of the Public Administration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

监管机构在法律规范的基础上行使规范性权力,这些法律规范以一种广泛而抽象的方式规定了该学说所同意的可理解原则。可理解的原则只确立了监管机构要实现的参数和目标。立法者只向监管机构确定信标,尽管范围很广,有时只基于标准。具有合法性原则经典意义的可理解原则之间存在一定的张力,这就规定了公共行政不能有任何创造的余地。因此,一些行政作者认为这种立法方法违宪。他们主张一种最大限度的法律观点:行政实体应该只执行法律。本文论证了使用可理解原则是符合宪法的,符合当前的现实,而且公共行政还有其他的控制机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
O poder normativo das agências reguladoras e o reconhecimento dos princípios inteligíveis pelo STF
Regulatory agencies exercise normative power on the basis of legal norms that, in a broad and abstract way, provide for what the doctrine has agreed to call intelligible principles. The intelligible principles only establish parameters and objectives to be achieved by the regulatory agency. The legislator only fixes beacons to the regulatory agency, although broad, sometimes based only on standards. There is a certain tension of intelligible principles with the classical meaning of the principle of legality, which provides that Public Administration cannot have any room for creation. Thus, some administrative authors consider this legislative technique unconstitutional. They advocate a maximalist view of the law: administrative entities should only enforce the law. This article demonstrates that the use of intelligible principles is constitutional and in line with current reality, and that there are other control mechanisms of the Public Administration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信