鸽派给富人,鹰派给穷人?货币政策的分配后果

N. Gornemann, Keith Kuester, M. Nakajima
{"title":"鸽派给富人,鹰派给穷人?货币政策的分配后果","authors":"N. Gornemann, Keith Kuester, M. Nakajima","doi":"10.17016/IFDP.2016.1167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We build a New Keynesian business-cycle model with rich household heterogeneity. A central feature is that matching frictions render labor-market risk countercyclical and endogenous to monetary policy. Our main result is that a majority of households prefer substantial stabilization of unemployment even if this means deviations from price stability. A monetary policy focused on unemployment stabilization helps \"Main Street\" by providing consumption insurance. It hurts \"Wall Street\" by reducing precautionary saving and, thus, asset prices. On the aggregate level, household heterogeneity changes the trans mission of monetary policy to consumption, but hardly to GDP. Central to this result is allowing for self-insurance and aggregate investment.","PeriodicalId":287856,"journal":{"name":"Board of Governors: International Finance Discussion Papers (Topic)","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"189","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Doves for the Rich, Hawks for the Poor? Distributional Consequences of Monetary Policy\",\"authors\":\"N. Gornemann, Keith Kuester, M. Nakajima\",\"doi\":\"10.17016/IFDP.2016.1167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We build a New Keynesian business-cycle model with rich household heterogeneity. A central feature is that matching frictions render labor-market risk countercyclical and endogenous to monetary policy. Our main result is that a majority of households prefer substantial stabilization of unemployment even if this means deviations from price stability. A monetary policy focused on unemployment stabilization helps \\\"Main Street\\\" by providing consumption insurance. It hurts \\\"Wall Street\\\" by reducing precautionary saving and, thus, asset prices. On the aggregate level, household heterogeneity changes the trans mission of monetary policy to consumption, but hardly to GDP. Central to this result is allowing for self-insurance and aggregate investment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Board of Governors: International Finance Discussion Papers (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"189\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Board of Governors: International Finance Discussion Papers (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17016/IFDP.2016.1167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Board of Governors: International Finance Discussion Papers (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17016/IFDP.2016.1167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 189

摘要

我们建立了一个具有丰富家庭异质性的新凯恩斯经济周期模型。一个核心特征是,匹配摩擦使劳动力市场风险逆周期且内生于货币政策。我们的主要结果是,大多数家庭宁愿失业率大幅稳定,即使这意味着偏离价格稳定。专注于稳定失业率的货币政策通过提供消费保险来帮助“普通民众”。它减少了预防性储蓄,从而降低了资产价格,从而伤害了“华尔街”。在总体水平上,家庭异质性改变了货币政策对消费的传导,但对GDP的传导几乎没有影响。这一结果的核心是允许自我保险和总投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Doves for the Rich, Hawks for the Poor? Distributional Consequences of Monetary Policy
We build a New Keynesian business-cycle model with rich household heterogeneity. A central feature is that matching frictions render labor-market risk countercyclical and endogenous to monetary policy. Our main result is that a majority of households prefer substantial stabilization of unemployment even if this means deviations from price stability. A monetary policy focused on unemployment stabilization helps "Main Street" by providing consumption insurance. It hurts "Wall Street" by reducing precautionary saving and, thus, asset prices. On the aggregate level, household heterogeneity changes the trans mission of monetary policy to consumption, but hardly to GDP. Central to this result is allowing for self-insurance and aggregate investment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信