历史视角下的非国大与传统权威

Mojalefa L. J. Koenane
{"title":"历史视角下的非国大与传统权威","authors":"Mojalefa L. J. Koenane","doi":"10.4314/INDILINGA.V7I1.26403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topic of traditional leaders and their role has always been of great interest not only to anthropologists but also to politicians, the youth, missionaries, business entrepreneurs and government bureaucrats. Policy development that forms part of the government' outputs are influenced by many factors which includes historical facts, political ideologies, cultural differences and sometimes leadership. This article deals with some of these determinants. These give us a better picture as we attempt to outline the existing conflict between the African National Congress (herein referred to as ANC) and the ongoing\npolitical battle with the indigenous traditional system of governance in the form of traditional\nleadership. As a point of departure the author briefly outlines the position of the\nConstitution regarding traditional leaders in the democratic dispensation of South Africa. I\nconclude that the ANC's position is ambivalent. It is this ambiguity that contributes to an\nunclear policy formulation when it comes to defining the role and status of traditional\nleaders within the local government structures. The article also discusses what the ANC\nregards as the weaknesses of the traditional leadership and thus arrives at the conclusion\nthat the institution of traditional leadership is by nature an undemocratic entity that must\nbe abolished. The alleged undemocratic practices also include the exclusion of women as\ntraditional leaders. The author argues that the institution of traditional leadership can and\nmust be democratised and therefore be sustained for the benefit of development in rural\nareas. Keywords : Traditional leadership, political ideology, indigenous traditional system of governance, historical perspective. Indilinga Vol. 7 (1) 2008: pp. 87-102","PeriodicalId":151323,"journal":{"name":"Indilinga: African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ANC And Traditional Authorities In Historical Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Mojalefa L. J. Koenane\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/INDILINGA.V7I1.26403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The topic of traditional leaders and their role has always been of great interest not only to anthropologists but also to politicians, the youth, missionaries, business entrepreneurs and government bureaucrats. Policy development that forms part of the government' outputs are influenced by many factors which includes historical facts, political ideologies, cultural differences and sometimes leadership. This article deals with some of these determinants. These give us a better picture as we attempt to outline the existing conflict between the African National Congress (herein referred to as ANC) and the ongoing\\npolitical battle with the indigenous traditional system of governance in the form of traditional\\nleadership. As a point of departure the author briefly outlines the position of the\\nConstitution regarding traditional leaders in the democratic dispensation of South Africa. I\\nconclude that the ANC's position is ambivalent. It is this ambiguity that contributes to an\\nunclear policy formulation when it comes to defining the role and status of traditional\\nleaders within the local government structures. The article also discusses what the ANC\\nregards as the weaknesses of the traditional leadership and thus arrives at the conclusion\\nthat the institution of traditional leadership is by nature an undemocratic entity that must\\nbe abolished. The alleged undemocratic practices also include the exclusion of women as\\ntraditional leaders. The author argues that the institution of traditional leadership can and\\nmust be democratised and therefore be sustained for the benefit of development in rural\\nareas. Keywords : Traditional leadership, political ideology, indigenous traditional system of governance, historical perspective. Indilinga Vol. 7 (1) 2008: pp. 87-102\",\"PeriodicalId\":151323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indilinga: African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indilinga: African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/INDILINGA.V7I1.26403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indilinga: African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/INDILINGA.V7I1.26403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

不仅人类学家,而且政治家、青年、传教士、企业家和政府官员都对传统领袖及其角色的话题非常感兴趣。作为政府产出一部分的政策制定受到许多因素的影响,这些因素包括历史事实、政治意识形态、文化差异,有时还包括领导力。本文讨论了其中的一些决定因素。当我们试图勾勒出非洲人国民大会(简称ANC)之间现存的冲突,以及与传统领导形式的本土传统治理体系之间正在进行的政治斗争时,这些都给了我们一个更好的图景。作为出发点,作者简要概述了宪法对南非民主制度中传统领导人的立场。我认为非国大的立场是矛盾的。当涉及到在地方政府结构中定义传统领导人的角色和地位时,正是这种模糊性导致了政策制定的不明确。文章还讨论了作者认为传统领导的弱点,从而得出传统领导制度本质上是一种必须废除的非民主实体的结论。所谓的不民主行为还包括排斥女性传统领导人。作者认为,传统的领导制度能够而且必须民主化,因此为了农村地区的发展而得以维持。关键词:传统领导;政治意识形态;本土传统治理制度;印染工业Vol. 7 (1) 2008: pp. 87-102
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The ANC And Traditional Authorities In Historical Perspective
The topic of traditional leaders and their role has always been of great interest not only to anthropologists but also to politicians, the youth, missionaries, business entrepreneurs and government bureaucrats. Policy development that forms part of the government' outputs are influenced by many factors which includes historical facts, political ideologies, cultural differences and sometimes leadership. This article deals with some of these determinants. These give us a better picture as we attempt to outline the existing conflict between the African National Congress (herein referred to as ANC) and the ongoing political battle with the indigenous traditional system of governance in the form of traditional leadership. As a point of departure the author briefly outlines the position of the Constitution regarding traditional leaders in the democratic dispensation of South Africa. I conclude that the ANC's position is ambivalent. It is this ambiguity that contributes to an unclear policy formulation when it comes to defining the role and status of traditional leaders within the local government structures. The article also discusses what the ANC regards as the weaknesses of the traditional leadership and thus arrives at the conclusion that the institution of traditional leadership is by nature an undemocratic entity that must be abolished. The alleged undemocratic practices also include the exclusion of women as traditional leaders. The author argues that the institution of traditional leadership can and must be democratised and therefore be sustained for the benefit of development in rural areas. Keywords : Traditional leadership, political ideology, indigenous traditional system of governance, historical perspective. Indilinga Vol. 7 (1) 2008: pp. 87-102
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信