电磁法探测(EM法探测)技术的现状和展望

忠徳 後藤, 均 三ケ田
{"title":"电磁法探测(EM法探测)技术的现状和展望","authors":"忠徳 後藤, 均 三ケ田","doi":"10.5026/JGEOGRAPHY.117.997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electromagnetic (EM) methods have been developed for estimating the apparent resistivity or conductivity of material composing subsurface structure depending on survey objectives, while seismic methods are applied mainly to understand geological structure or stratigraphy. Magnetotelluric subsurface sounding (MT) methods are proven tools detect high-conductivity anomalies in the Earth's interior; controlled source EM (CSEM) methods detect high-conductivity anomalies; and, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) methods estimate “the mean free path” of hydrogen atoms in various molecules composing underground materials. Regarding methodologies, EM methods frequently applied in practice are: (1) natural source MT methods, (2) artificial source MT or EM methods, and (3) borehole EM methods. The fundamental principles of these methods can be summarized as measuring the induction effects of a survey target using a natural or artificial electromagnetic source. Finally, we investigate examples of recent EM approaches in connection with seismic methods and discuss the integration of survey data from both methods as a key to exploring underground structures not only in terms of stratigraphic interpretation but also for estimating material physical properties.","PeriodicalId":356213,"journal":{"name":"Chigaku Zasshi (jounal of Geography)","volume":"2014 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"電磁気法探査(EM法探査)技術の現状と展望\",\"authors\":\"忠徳 後藤, 均 三ケ田\",\"doi\":\"10.5026/JGEOGRAPHY.117.997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Electromagnetic (EM) methods have been developed for estimating the apparent resistivity or conductivity of material composing subsurface structure depending on survey objectives, while seismic methods are applied mainly to understand geological structure or stratigraphy. Magnetotelluric subsurface sounding (MT) methods are proven tools detect high-conductivity anomalies in the Earth's interior; controlled source EM (CSEM) methods detect high-conductivity anomalies; and, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) methods estimate “the mean free path” of hydrogen atoms in various molecules composing underground materials. Regarding methodologies, EM methods frequently applied in practice are: (1) natural source MT methods, (2) artificial source MT or EM methods, and (3) borehole EM methods. The fundamental principles of these methods can be summarized as measuring the induction effects of a survey target using a natural or artificial electromagnetic source. Finally, we investigate examples of recent EM approaches in connection with seismic methods and discuss the integration of survey data from both methods as a key to exploring underground structures not only in terms of stratigraphic interpretation but also for estimating material physical properties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chigaku Zasshi (jounal of Geography)\",\"volume\":\"2014 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chigaku Zasshi (jounal of Geography)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5026/JGEOGRAPHY.117.997\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chigaku Zasshi (jounal of Geography)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5026/JGEOGRAPHY.117.997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

电磁法(EM)已经发展为根据测量目标估计构成地下结构的物质的视电阻率或电导率,而地震方法主要用于了解地质构造或地层学。大地电磁地下测深(MT)方法是探测地球内部高电导率异常的行之有效的工具;可控源EM (CSEM)方法检测高电导率异常;核磁共振(NMR)方法估计了构成地下物质的各种分子中氢原子的“平均自由程”。在方法方面,实践中常用的电磁方法有:(1)自然源大地电磁法,(2)人工源大地电磁法或电磁法,(3)井眼电磁法。这些方法的基本原理可以概括为利用天然或人工电磁源测量测量目标的感应效应。最后,我们研究了最近的电磁方法与地震方法相结合的例子,并讨论了两种方法的调查数据的整合,作为勘探地下结构的关键,不仅在地层解释方面,而且在估计物质物理性质方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
電磁気法探査(EM法探査)技術の現状と展望
Electromagnetic (EM) methods have been developed for estimating the apparent resistivity or conductivity of material composing subsurface structure depending on survey objectives, while seismic methods are applied mainly to understand geological structure or stratigraphy. Magnetotelluric subsurface sounding (MT) methods are proven tools detect high-conductivity anomalies in the Earth's interior; controlled source EM (CSEM) methods detect high-conductivity anomalies; and, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) methods estimate “the mean free path” of hydrogen atoms in various molecules composing underground materials. Regarding methodologies, EM methods frequently applied in practice are: (1) natural source MT methods, (2) artificial source MT or EM methods, and (3) borehole EM methods. The fundamental principles of these methods can be summarized as measuring the induction effects of a survey target using a natural or artificial electromagnetic source. Finally, we investigate examples of recent EM approaches in connection with seismic methods and discuss the integration of survey data from both methods as a key to exploring underground structures not only in terms of stratigraphic interpretation but also for estimating material physical properties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信