基于可分性规则的眼动追踪评价启发式设置

P. Potgieter, P. Blignaut
{"title":"基于可分性规则的眼动追踪评价启发式设置","authors":"P. Potgieter, P. Blignaut","doi":"10.1109/ICONIC.2018.8601297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"True/false questions are one of the basic question types widely used in assessments. Although true/false questions are easy to construct and take little time to be answered, there is a high probability of learners guessing the correct answer. A correct answer to a true/false question is not an indication that a learner fully understands the concept being tested. That said, an incorrect answer does not necessarily mean that the learner does not understand the concept being tested. There may be another reason why the learner gave an incorrect answer. Specifically, when a teacher uses true/false questions to assess learners on divisibility rules, the teacher has to ensure that learners use their knowledge to determine the answer. Therefore, careful compilation of the dividends for an assessment can contribute to determining whether the learner applied the divisibility rules correctly. Eye-tracking can be used to provide objective and quantitative information about the user’s intended gaze-patterns over a specific stimulus. Therefore, the gaze behaviour of learners can be used as an indication whether they inspected the appropriate digits of the dividend. It is suggested that (i) heuristics on compiling appropriate dividends, and (ii) setting minimum gaze requirements for attention levels per digit of the dividend for each divisor, could assist teachers in compiling effective true/false assessments to test learners’ knowledge of divisibility rules.","PeriodicalId":277315,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Computing Applications (ICONIC)","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Setting Heuristics for Eye-Tracking Assessment on Divisibility Rules\",\"authors\":\"P. Potgieter, P. Blignaut\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICONIC.2018.8601297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"True/false questions are one of the basic question types widely used in assessments. Although true/false questions are easy to construct and take little time to be answered, there is a high probability of learners guessing the correct answer. A correct answer to a true/false question is not an indication that a learner fully understands the concept being tested. That said, an incorrect answer does not necessarily mean that the learner does not understand the concept being tested. There may be another reason why the learner gave an incorrect answer. Specifically, when a teacher uses true/false questions to assess learners on divisibility rules, the teacher has to ensure that learners use their knowledge to determine the answer. Therefore, careful compilation of the dividends for an assessment can contribute to determining whether the learner applied the divisibility rules correctly. Eye-tracking can be used to provide objective and quantitative information about the user’s intended gaze-patterns over a specific stimulus. Therefore, the gaze behaviour of learners can be used as an indication whether they inspected the appropriate digits of the dividend. It is suggested that (i) heuristics on compiling appropriate dividends, and (ii) setting minimum gaze requirements for attention levels per digit of the dividend for each divisor, could assist teachers in compiling effective true/false assessments to test learners’ knowledge of divisibility rules.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Computing Applications (ICONIC)\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Computing Applications (ICONIC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICONIC.2018.8601297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Computing Applications (ICONIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICONIC.2018.8601297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

真假题是测评中广泛使用的基本题型之一。虽然真假问题很容易构建,回答时间也很短,但学习者猜出正确答案的概率很高。对真假问题的正确回答并不表明学习者完全理解了被测试的概念。也就是说,一个不正确的答案并不一定意味着学习者不理解被测试的概念。学习者给出错误答案可能还有另外一个原因。具体来说,当教师使用真假问题来评估学习者的可除性规则时,教师必须确保学习者使用他们的知识来确定答案。因此,仔细编制评估的股息可以有助于确定学习者是否正确地应用了可除性规则。眼动追踪技术可以为特定刺激下用户预期的注视模式提供客观和定量的信息。因此,学习者的注视行为可以作为他们是否检查了红利的适当数字的指示。建议(1)启发式地编制适当的除数,(2)对每个除数的每个数字的注意水平设定最低注视要求,可以帮助教师编制有效的真假评估,以测试学习者对除数规则的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Setting Heuristics for Eye-Tracking Assessment on Divisibility Rules
True/false questions are one of the basic question types widely used in assessments. Although true/false questions are easy to construct and take little time to be answered, there is a high probability of learners guessing the correct answer. A correct answer to a true/false question is not an indication that a learner fully understands the concept being tested. That said, an incorrect answer does not necessarily mean that the learner does not understand the concept being tested. There may be another reason why the learner gave an incorrect answer. Specifically, when a teacher uses true/false questions to assess learners on divisibility rules, the teacher has to ensure that learners use their knowledge to determine the answer. Therefore, careful compilation of the dividends for an assessment can contribute to determining whether the learner applied the divisibility rules correctly. Eye-tracking can be used to provide objective and quantitative information about the user’s intended gaze-patterns over a specific stimulus. Therefore, the gaze behaviour of learners can be used as an indication whether they inspected the appropriate digits of the dividend. It is suggested that (i) heuristics on compiling appropriate dividends, and (ii) setting minimum gaze requirements for attention levels per digit of the dividend for each divisor, could assist teachers in compiling effective true/false assessments to test learners’ knowledge of divisibility rules.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信