俄罗斯联邦宪法法院在住房领域的立场:执行问题

S. Suslova
{"title":"俄罗斯联邦宪法法院在住房领域的立场:执行问题","authors":"S. Suslova","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2022.1.5.","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article expresses the hypothesis that non-execution of the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in the housing law sphere is often predetermined by the political and legal moments associated with the need to choose between the protection of economic turnover and housing rights of citizens. Often the apparent fair decision aimed at taking into account the social importance of housing relations, on the scale of public policy can lead to serious adverse economic consequences. The hypothesis was confirmed when analyzing several fundamental decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in the sphere of regulation of housing relations, including the position on the possibility to sell residential premises in which underage family members of the owner reside and who do not have the right of ownership, the position on property immunity with regard to the only residential premises, as well as the position on the execution major repairs by a public authority (former landlord of the residential premises). It is concluded that the most effective are those decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, in which this choice is made unambiguously, without any attempts to reconcile these two areas.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ositions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in the Housing Sphere: Problems of Implementation\",\"authors\":\"S. Suslova\",\"doi\":\"10.21639/2313-6715.2022.1.5.\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article expresses the hypothesis that non-execution of the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in the housing law sphere is often predetermined by the political and legal moments associated with the need to choose between the protection of economic turnover and housing rights of citizens. Often the apparent fair decision aimed at taking into account the social importance of housing relations, on the scale of public policy can lead to serious adverse economic consequences. The hypothesis was confirmed when analyzing several fundamental decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in the sphere of regulation of housing relations, including the position on the possibility to sell residential premises in which underage family members of the owner reside and who do not have the right of ownership, the position on property immunity with regard to the only residential premises, as well as the position on the execution major repairs by a public authority (former landlord of the residential premises). It is concluded that the most effective are those decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, in which this choice is made unambiguously, without any attempts to reconcile these two areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prologue: Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prologue: Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2022.1.5.\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prologue: Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2022.1.5.","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该条所表达的假设是,不执行俄罗斯联邦宪法法院在住房法领域的决定往往是由与需要在保护经济营业额和公民住房权利之间作出选择有关的政治和法律时刻预先决定的。在公共政策层面上,旨在考虑住房关系的社会重要性的看似公平的决定往往会导致严重的不利经济后果。在分析俄罗斯联邦宪法法院在住房关系管理领域的几项基本决定时,这一假设得到了证实,这些决定包括关于出售房主的未成年家庭成员居住但没有所有权的住宅房地的可能性的立场、关于唯一住宅房地的财产豁免的立场。以及公共当局(住宅房屋的前业主)对执行重大维修的立场。结论是,最有效的是俄罗斯联邦宪法法院的那些决定,其中明确地作出了这一选择,而没有试图调和这两个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ositions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in the Housing Sphere: Problems of Implementation
The article expresses the hypothesis that non-execution of the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in the housing law sphere is often predetermined by the political and legal moments associated with the need to choose between the protection of economic turnover and housing rights of citizens. Often the apparent fair decision aimed at taking into account the social importance of housing relations, on the scale of public policy can lead to serious adverse economic consequences. The hypothesis was confirmed when analyzing several fundamental decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in the sphere of regulation of housing relations, including the position on the possibility to sell residential premises in which underage family members of the owner reside and who do not have the right of ownership, the position on property immunity with regard to the only residential premises, as well as the position on the execution major repairs by a public authority (former landlord of the residential premises). It is concluded that the most effective are those decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, in which this choice is made unambiguously, without any attempts to reconcile these two areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信