引言:种姓在/作为人文学科:扰乱政治的痛苦

K. Das, S. Sengupta
{"title":"引言:种姓在/作为人文学科:扰乱政治的痛苦","authors":"K. Das, S. Sengupta","doi":"10.35684/jlci.2019.6101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Caste ̧ as Nicholas Dirks suggests, has become the most important and well-known register of identification of the Indian civilisation. It is often considered ‘intrinsic’ to the Hindu society in the scholarly investigations on India (or more generally on South Asia) emerging in the global academia (Dirks 3). From the time of early travel narratives on South Asia by western tradesmen, orientalist scholars like William Jones, Max Muller, narratives written by Christian missionaries like Charles Mead or Robert Caldwell or the denigrators of ‘oriental societies’ like G.W. F. Hegel and concerned critics like Karl Marx to much of our postcolonial socio-political struggles, ‘caste’ has been perceived as either an elusive, resilient, hydra-headed monster, or a unique feature of the Hindu society that preempts competition that western modernity brings about.","PeriodicalId":183557,"journal":{"name":"Sanglap: Journal of Literary and Cultural Inquiry","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: Caste in/as Humanities: Unsettling the Politics of Suffering\",\"authors\":\"K. Das, S. Sengupta\",\"doi\":\"10.35684/jlci.2019.6101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Caste ̧ as Nicholas Dirks suggests, has become the most important and well-known register of identification of the Indian civilisation. It is often considered ‘intrinsic’ to the Hindu society in the scholarly investigations on India (or more generally on South Asia) emerging in the global academia (Dirks 3). From the time of early travel narratives on South Asia by western tradesmen, orientalist scholars like William Jones, Max Muller, narratives written by Christian missionaries like Charles Mead or Robert Caldwell or the denigrators of ‘oriental societies’ like G.W. F. Hegel and concerned critics like Karl Marx to much of our postcolonial socio-political struggles, ‘caste’ has been perceived as either an elusive, resilient, hydra-headed monster, or a unique feature of the Hindu society that preempts competition that western modernity brings about.\",\"PeriodicalId\":183557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sanglap: Journal of Literary and Cultural Inquiry\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sanglap: Journal of Literary and Cultural Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35684/jlci.2019.6101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sanglap: Journal of Literary and Cultural Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35684/jlci.2019.6101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正如尼古拉斯·德克斯(Nicholas Dirks)所指出的,种姓已经成为印度文明最重要、最著名的身份证明。在全球学术界对印度(或更广泛地说,对南亚)的学术调查中,它通常被认为是印度社会的“内在”(Dirks 3)。从西方商人对南亚的早期旅行叙述开始,威廉·琼斯、马克斯·穆勒等东方学学者、无论是查尔斯·米德(Charles Mead)或罗伯特·考德威尔(Robert Caldwell)等基督教传教士,还是黑格尔(g.w.f. Hegel)等“东方社会”的诋毁者,还是卡尔·马克思(Karl Marx)等关注后殖民社会政治斗争的批评者,都认为“种姓”要么是一个难以捉摸的、有弹性的、长着长头的怪物,要么是印度社会的一个独特特征,它先发制人地阻止了西方现代性带来的竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction: Caste in/as Humanities: Unsettling the Politics of Suffering
Caste ̧ as Nicholas Dirks suggests, has become the most important and well-known register of identification of the Indian civilisation. It is often considered ‘intrinsic’ to the Hindu society in the scholarly investigations on India (or more generally on South Asia) emerging in the global academia (Dirks 3). From the time of early travel narratives on South Asia by western tradesmen, orientalist scholars like William Jones, Max Muller, narratives written by Christian missionaries like Charles Mead or Robert Caldwell or the denigrators of ‘oriental societies’ like G.W. F. Hegel and concerned critics like Karl Marx to much of our postcolonial socio-political struggles, ‘caste’ has been perceived as either an elusive, resilient, hydra-headed monster, or a unique feature of the Hindu society that preempts competition that western modernity brings about.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信