同步1999年RUTAN BNN对惩教系统框架内第58号PP的授权设置

Markus Marselinus Soge
{"title":"同步1999年RUTAN BNN对惩教系统框架内第58号PP的授权设置","authors":"Markus Marselinus Soge","doi":"10.21274/legacy.2021.1.2.81-103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The responsibility of organizing the correctional system includes the construction of inmates and the treatment of prisoners at        the Directorate General of Corrections, but in practice, prisoners are not always in Rutan or Rutan Branch owned by Kemenkumham. BNN also manages Rutan Branch which is regulated in BNN Head Regulation No. 6 of 2016 concerning Prisoner Supervision. The problem here is how the synchronization level of the regulation of the authority of Rutan Branch of BNN against PP No.58 of 1999 within the framework of the correctional system. Normative legal research methods with legal approaches are used in this paper, and also used secondary data, namely primary and secondary legal materials. The data is collected by library study techniques, then qualitatively analyzed with legal interpretation. The results of the study are using guidelines for evaluation of legislation, especially table 3 assessment with variable 'authority' then the BNN Head Regulation No. 6 of 2016 is unsynchronized with PP No.58 of 1999 in the indicator 'there are arrangements about the same authority on 2 (two) or more regulations whose hierarchy is different, but the implementing agencies are different'. It is recommended that the Directorate General of Corrections of Kemenkumham can coordinate with BNN to discuss the unsynchronized of the authority arrangements of the Rutan Branch of BNN related to the supervision of prisoners to strengthen the implementation of the correctional system.","PeriodicalId":114951,"journal":{"name":"Legacy: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-Undangan","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SINKRONISASI PENGATURAN KEWENANGAN CABANG RUTAN BNN TERHADAP PP NOMOR 58 TAHUN 1999 DALAM KERANGKA SISTEM PEMASYARAKATAN\",\"authors\":\"Markus Marselinus Soge\",\"doi\":\"10.21274/legacy.2021.1.2.81-103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The responsibility of organizing the correctional system includes the construction of inmates and the treatment of prisoners at        the Directorate General of Corrections, but in practice, prisoners are not always in Rutan or Rutan Branch owned by Kemenkumham. BNN also manages Rutan Branch which is regulated in BNN Head Regulation No. 6 of 2016 concerning Prisoner Supervision. The problem here is how the synchronization level of the regulation of the authority of Rutan Branch of BNN against PP No.58 of 1999 within the framework of the correctional system. Normative legal research methods with legal approaches are used in this paper, and also used secondary data, namely primary and secondary legal materials. The data is collected by library study techniques, then qualitatively analyzed with legal interpretation. The results of the study are using guidelines for evaluation of legislation, especially table 3 assessment with variable 'authority' then the BNN Head Regulation No. 6 of 2016 is unsynchronized with PP No.58 of 1999 in the indicator 'there are arrangements about the same authority on 2 (two) or more regulations whose hierarchy is different, but the implementing agencies are different'. It is recommended that the Directorate General of Corrections of Kemenkumham can coordinate with BNN to discuss the unsynchronized of the authority arrangements of the Rutan Branch of BNN related to the supervision of prisoners to strengthen the implementation of the correctional system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legacy: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-Undangan\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legacy: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-Undangan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21274/legacy.2021.1.2.81-103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legacy: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-Undangan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21274/legacy.2021.1.2.81-103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

组织惩教系统的责任包括囚犯的建设和囚犯在惩教总局的待遇,但实际上,囚犯并不总是在鲁坦或克门库姆所有的鲁坦分局。BNN还管理Rutan分公司,该分公司受BNN 2016年第6号关于囚犯监管的总则监管。这里的问题是,BNN鲁坦分行的权力与1999年PP No.58的监管在矫正制度框架内的同步程度如何。本文采用了规范性的法律研究方法和法律研究方法,并使用了二手资料,即一手法律资料和第二手法律资料。这些数据是通过图书馆研究技术收集的,然后用法律解释进行定性分析。该研究的结果是使用立法评估指南,特别是表3评估具有可变的“权限”,那么2016年BNN第6号总则与1999年PP第58号在指标“在2(两个)或更多的法规上有关于相同权限的安排,这些法规的层次不同,但实施机构不同”中不同步。建议Kemenkumham惩戒总局与BNN协调,讨论BNN鲁坦分局与囚犯监管有关的权力安排不同步的问题,以加强惩戒制度的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SINKRONISASI PENGATURAN KEWENANGAN CABANG RUTAN BNN TERHADAP PP NOMOR 58 TAHUN 1999 DALAM KERANGKA SISTEM PEMASYARAKATAN
The responsibility of organizing the correctional system includes the construction of inmates and the treatment of prisoners at        the Directorate General of Corrections, but in practice, prisoners are not always in Rutan or Rutan Branch owned by Kemenkumham. BNN also manages Rutan Branch which is regulated in BNN Head Regulation No. 6 of 2016 concerning Prisoner Supervision. The problem here is how the synchronization level of the regulation of the authority of Rutan Branch of BNN against PP No.58 of 1999 within the framework of the correctional system. Normative legal research methods with legal approaches are used in this paper, and also used secondary data, namely primary and secondary legal materials. The data is collected by library study techniques, then qualitatively analyzed with legal interpretation. The results of the study are using guidelines for evaluation of legislation, especially table 3 assessment with variable 'authority' then the BNN Head Regulation No. 6 of 2016 is unsynchronized with PP No.58 of 1999 in the indicator 'there are arrangements about the same authority on 2 (two) or more regulations whose hierarchy is different, but the implementing agencies are different'. It is recommended that the Directorate General of Corrections of Kemenkumham can coordinate with BNN to discuss the unsynchronized of the authority arrangements of the Rutan Branch of BNN related to the supervision of prisoners to strengthen the implementation of the correctional system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信