系统回顾:原则和步骤

Z. Nagy
{"title":"系统回顾:原则和步骤","authors":"Z. Nagy","doi":"10.58423/2786-6742/2022-2-47-53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been an explosion of literature information over the last decades along with a large increasing primary research publication. On the one hand, this process has been accompanied by an expansion in the range of different methodological approaches and reviews. The first aim of this publication is to give a short overview regarding the main differences among the reviews, then secondly the author focuses on the frequently used method, the so-called systematic review because there are significant inconsistences and variabilities how to properly conduct and report a systematic review and it can lead to misleading results. The systematic review has been performed in various and popular fields like nursing, sport, medicine, health care, psychologic, anaesthesiology. The third aim this publication is to provide a comprehensive summary regarding how to conduct and implement a systematic review. Results show that it is necessary and useful to implement a PRISMA checklist and a PICO flow chart. In this publication the second part connect to a hot topic namely agriculture. In the case of agriculture, the literature of systematic reviews can also be found however these reviews focus on a little part of economic and social matters as smart agriculture, health and safety in agriculture works and landscape and there are only a few literatures examining other aspect of agriculture like productivity and efficiency. Moreover, there is a gap in literature of systematic reviews examine the environmental aspect. The last objective, a longer-term aim, will be to report and conduct a systematic literature review regarding relevant topic in agriculture I connection with climate change, productivity and efficiency and will contribute the existing literature in this field.","PeriodicalId":106282,"journal":{"name":"Acta Academiae Beregsasiensis. Economics","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review: principles and steps\",\"authors\":\"Z. Nagy\",\"doi\":\"10.58423/2786-6742/2022-2-47-53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There has been an explosion of literature information over the last decades along with a large increasing primary research publication. On the one hand, this process has been accompanied by an expansion in the range of different methodological approaches and reviews. The first aim of this publication is to give a short overview regarding the main differences among the reviews, then secondly the author focuses on the frequently used method, the so-called systematic review because there are significant inconsistences and variabilities how to properly conduct and report a systematic review and it can lead to misleading results. The systematic review has been performed in various and popular fields like nursing, sport, medicine, health care, psychologic, anaesthesiology. The third aim this publication is to provide a comprehensive summary regarding how to conduct and implement a systematic review. Results show that it is necessary and useful to implement a PRISMA checklist and a PICO flow chart. In this publication the second part connect to a hot topic namely agriculture. In the case of agriculture, the literature of systematic reviews can also be found however these reviews focus on a little part of economic and social matters as smart agriculture, health and safety in agriculture works and landscape and there are only a few literatures examining other aspect of agriculture like productivity and efficiency. Moreover, there is a gap in literature of systematic reviews examine the environmental aspect. The last objective, a longer-term aim, will be to report and conduct a systematic literature review regarding relevant topic in agriculture I connection with climate change, productivity and efficiency and will contribute the existing literature in this field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Academiae Beregsasiensis. Economics\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Academiae Beregsasiensis. Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2022-2-47-53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Academiae Beregsasiensis. Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2022-2-47-53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几十年里,随着大量的初级研究出版物的增加,文献信息爆炸式增长。一方面,伴随着这一进程的是不同的方法方法和审查范围的扩大。本出版物的第一个目的是对综述之间的主要差异进行简要概述,其次作者重点介绍了常用的方法,即所谓的系统综述,因为存在显着的不一致和可变性,如何正确地进行和报告系统综述,它可能导致误导性的结果。系统评价已在护理、运动、医学、保健、心理学、麻醉学等各种流行领域进行。本出版物的第三个目的是提供关于如何进行和实施系统审查的全面总结。结果表明,建立PRISMA检查表和PICO流程图是必要和有用的。在本出版物的第二部分连接到一个热门话题,即农业。在农业方面,也可以找到系统评论的文献,但是这些评论只关注经济和社会问题的一小部分,如智能农业,农业工程和景观的健康和安全,只有少数文献研究农业的其他方面,如生产力和效率。此外,关于环境方面的系统评价的文献也存在空白。最后一个目标,一个较长期的目标,将是报告和进行一个系统的文献综述有关农业相关主题与气候变化,生产力和效率,并将贡献现有的文献在这一领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review: principles and steps
There has been an explosion of literature information over the last decades along with a large increasing primary research publication. On the one hand, this process has been accompanied by an expansion in the range of different methodological approaches and reviews. The first aim of this publication is to give a short overview regarding the main differences among the reviews, then secondly the author focuses on the frequently used method, the so-called systematic review because there are significant inconsistences and variabilities how to properly conduct and report a systematic review and it can lead to misleading results. The systematic review has been performed in various and popular fields like nursing, sport, medicine, health care, psychologic, anaesthesiology. The third aim this publication is to provide a comprehensive summary regarding how to conduct and implement a systematic review. Results show that it is necessary and useful to implement a PRISMA checklist and a PICO flow chart. In this publication the second part connect to a hot topic namely agriculture. In the case of agriculture, the literature of systematic reviews can also be found however these reviews focus on a little part of economic and social matters as smart agriculture, health and safety in agriculture works and landscape and there are only a few literatures examining other aspect of agriculture like productivity and efficiency. Moreover, there is a gap in literature of systematic reviews examine the environmental aspect. The last objective, a longer-term aim, will be to report and conduct a systematic literature review regarding relevant topic in agriculture I connection with climate change, productivity and efficiency and will contribute the existing literature in this field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信