不同零知识论证体系的比较研究

Jeril Kuriakose, Pushpendra Singh Sisodia, A. V, Dhvani K. Shah, Shraddha S. More, St John
{"title":"不同零知识论证体系的比较研究","authors":"Jeril Kuriakose, Pushpendra Singh Sisodia, A. V, Dhvani K. Shah, Shraddha S. More, St John","doi":"10.1109/SAPIENCE.2016.7684134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cryptography and complexity theory have gained a lot of importance because of zero-knowledge proofs. The motive behind zero-knowledge proofs are to provide an obfuscation to the verifier, so that the verifier will not understand the information sent by the prover. Zero-knowledge proofs are normally used to verify a prover's theorem to a verifier, in such a way that the verifier will not be able to discover any supplementary evidence other than the proof given to him. An enigmatic conception was formalized, that lead to the formation zero-knowledge proof systems. In this paper, we have reviewed different zero-knowledge argument / proof techniques. We have also reviewed the proof system implications in the presence of malicious prover and malicious verifier. Examples related to zero-knowledge argument systems are also given.","PeriodicalId":340137,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Conference on Data Mining and Advanced Computing (SAPIENCE)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of diverse zero-knowledge argument systems\",\"authors\":\"Jeril Kuriakose, Pushpendra Singh Sisodia, A. V, Dhvani K. Shah, Shraddha S. More, St John\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SAPIENCE.2016.7684134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cryptography and complexity theory have gained a lot of importance because of zero-knowledge proofs. The motive behind zero-knowledge proofs are to provide an obfuscation to the verifier, so that the verifier will not understand the information sent by the prover. Zero-knowledge proofs are normally used to verify a prover's theorem to a verifier, in such a way that the verifier will not be able to discover any supplementary evidence other than the proof given to him. An enigmatic conception was formalized, that lead to the formation zero-knowledge proof systems. In this paper, we have reviewed different zero-knowledge argument / proof techniques. We have also reviewed the proof system implications in the presence of malicious prover and malicious verifier. Examples related to zero-knowledge argument systems are also given.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 International Conference on Data Mining and Advanced Computing (SAPIENCE)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 International Conference on Data Mining and Advanced Computing (SAPIENCE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SAPIENCE.2016.7684134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Conference on Data Mining and Advanced Computing (SAPIENCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SAPIENCE.2016.7684134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

由于零知识证明,密码学和复杂性理论得到了很大的重视。零知识证明背后的动机是为验证者提供混淆,以便验证者无法理解证明者发送的信息。零知识证明通常用于向验证者验证证明者的定理,在这种方式下,验证者将无法发现除了提供给他的证明之外的任何补充证据。提出了一个神秘的概念,从而形成了零知识证明系统。在本文中,我们回顾了不同的零知识论证/证明技术。我们还回顾了存在恶意证明者和恶意验证者的证明系统的含义。给出了与零知识论证系统相关的实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of diverse zero-knowledge argument systems
Cryptography and complexity theory have gained a lot of importance because of zero-knowledge proofs. The motive behind zero-knowledge proofs are to provide an obfuscation to the verifier, so that the verifier will not understand the information sent by the prover. Zero-knowledge proofs are normally used to verify a prover's theorem to a verifier, in such a way that the verifier will not be able to discover any supplementary evidence other than the proof given to him. An enigmatic conception was formalized, that lead to the formation zero-knowledge proof systems. In this paper, we have reviewed different zero-knowledge argument / proof techniques. We have also reviewed the proof system implications in the presence of malicious prover and malicious verifier. Examples related to zero-knowledge argument systems are also given.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信