从会话因果关系到因果一致性

J. Brzeziński, Cezary Sobaniec, D. Wawrzyniak
{"title":"从会话因果关系到因果一致性","authors":"J. Brzeziński, Cezary Sobaniec, D. Wawrzyniak","doi":"10.1109/EMPDP.2004.1271440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We discuss relationships between client-centric consistency models (known as session guarantees), and data-centric consistency models. The first group includes: read-your-writes guarantee, monotonic-writes guarantee, monotonic-reads guarantee and writes-follow-reads guarantee. The other group includes: atomic consistency, sequential consistency, causal consistency, processor consistency, PRAM consistency, weak consistency, release consistency, scope consistency and entry consistency. We use a consistent notation to present formal definitions of both kinds of consistency models in the context of replicated shared objects. Next, we prove a relationship between causal consistency model and client-centric consistency models. Apparently, causal consistency is similar to writes-follow-reads guarantee. We show that in fact causal consistency requires all common session guarantees, i.e. read-your-writes, monotonic-writes, monotonic-reads and writes-follow-reads to be preserved.","PeriodicalId":105726,"journal":{"name":"12th Euromicro Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing, 2004. Proceedings.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"56","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From session causality to causal consistency\",\"authors\":\"J. Brzeziński, Cezary Sobaniec, D. Wawrzyniak\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EMPDP.2004.1271440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We discuss relationships between client-centric consistency models (known as session guarantees), and data-centric consistency models. The first group includes: read-your-writes guarantee, monotonic-writes guarantee, monotonic-reads guarantee and writes-follow-reads guarantee. The other group includes: atomic consistency, sequential consistency, causal consistency, processor consistency, PRAM consistency, weak consistency, release consistency, scope consistency and entry consistency. We use a consistent notation to present formal definitions of both kinds of consistency models in the context of replicated shared objects. Next, we prove a relationship between causal consistency model and client-centric consistency models. Apparently, causal consistency is similar to writes-follow-reads guarantee. We show that in fact causal consistency requires all common session guarantees, i.e. read-your-writes, monotonic-writes, monotonic-reads and writes-follow-reads to be preserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":105726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"12th Euromicro Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing, 2004. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"56\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"12th Euromicro Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing, 2004. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMPDP.2004.1271440\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"12th Euromicro Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing, 2004. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMPDP.2004.1271440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

摘要

我们将讨论以客户为中心的一致性模型(称为会话保证)和以数据为中心的一致性模型之间的关系。第一组包括:读先写保证、单调写保证、单调读保证和读后写保证。另一组包括:原子一致性、顺序一致性、因果一致性、处理器一致性、PRAM一致性、弱一致性、发布一致性、范围一致性和条目一致性。我们使用一致的符号来表示复制共享对象上下文中这两种一致性模型的形式化定义。接下来,我们证明了因果一致性模型和以客户为中心的一致性模型之间的关系。显然,因果一致性类似于写后读保证。我们表明,事实上,因果一致性需要所有常见的会话保证,即:读先写、单调写、单调读和写后读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From session causality to causal consistency
We discuss relationships between client-centric consistency models (known as session guarantees), and data-centric consistency models. The first group includes: read-your-writes guarantee, monotonic-writes guarantee, monotonic-reads guarantee and writes-follow-reads guarantee. The other group includes: atomic consistency, sequential consistency, causal consistency, processor consistency, PRAM consistency, weak consistency, release consistency, scope consistency and entry consistency. We use a consistent notation to present formal definitions of both kinds of consistency models in the context of replicated shared objects. Next, we prove a relationship between causal consistency model and client-centric consistency models. Apparently, causal consistency is similar to writes-follow-reads guarantee. We show that in fact causal consistency requires all common session guarantees, i.e. read-your-writes, monotonic-writes, monotonic-reads and writes-follow-reads to be preserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信