测试员有何感受?工业环境下TX评估经验报告

B. Bonifácio, O. Ekwoge, Camila Bernardon, Thiago L. Souto
{"title":"测试员有何感受?工业环境下TX评估经验报告","authors":"B. Bonifácio, O. Ekwoge, Camila Bernardon, Thiago L. Souto","doi":"10.1145/3482909.3482917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Software development is almost always performed by teams. Consequently, several factors such as environment, human aspects, and technologies adopted are likely to affect individual and team performance. Method: Motivated by this context, we conducted a survey with 27 testers of the SIDIA Institute of Science and Technology. The goal was to understand how human and technological aspects can affect test effectiveness, by considering the practitioners’ perspective on their homologation testing review practices with respect three aspects: the testing infrastructure, how they perceive the value of their contribution, and how they feel about their work. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of testers’ perception using the Tester Experience (TX) approach was conducted. Results: Our results show that by using scenarios, the testers’ perceptions with respect to the value of their contribution and how they feel about their work were clearly the highest rated factors. Conclusion: This work can serve as a basis for other companies in their testing teams to evaluate how the use of testing artifacts and how testing activities can improve TX.","PeriodicalId":355243,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th Brazilian Symposium on Systematic and Automated Software Testing","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do Testers Feel it? An Experience Report on Evaluating TX in an Industrial Context\",\"authors\":\"B. Bonifácio, O. Ekwoge, Camila Bernardon, Thiago L. Souto\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3482909.3482917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Software development is almost always performed by teams. Consequently, several factors such as environment, human aspects, and technologies adopted are likely to affect individual and team performance. Method: Motivated by this context, we conducted a survey with 27 testers of the SIDIA Institute of Science and Technology. The goal was to understand how human and technological aspects can affect test effectiveness, by considering the practitioners’ perspective on their homologation testing review practices with respect three aspects: the testing infrastructure, how they perceive the value of their contribution, and how they feel about their work. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of testers’ perception using the Tester Experience (TX) approach was conducted. Results: Our results show that by using scenarios, the testers’ perceptions with respect to the value of their contribution and how they feel about their work were clearly the highest rated factors. Conclusion: This work can serve as a basis for other companies in their testing teams to evaluate how the use of testing artifacts and how testing activities can improve TX.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 6th Brazilian Symposium on Systematic and Automated Software Testing\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 6th Brazilian Symposium on Systematic and Automated Software Testing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3482909.3482917\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 6th Brazilian Symposium on Systematic and Automated Software Testing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3482909.3482917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:软件开发几乎总是由团队执行的。因此,环境、人的方面和所采用的技术等几个因素可能会影响个人和团队的绩效。方法:在此背景下,我们对SIDIA科学技术研究所的27名测试人员进行了调查。目标是理解人类和技术方面是如何影响测试有效性的,通过考虑实践者对他们的认证测试评审实践的观点来考虑三个方面:测试基础结构,他们如何感知他们贡献的价值,以及他们如何感受他们的工作。使用测试人员经验(TX)方法对测试人员的感知进行了定性和定量分析。结果:我们的结果表明,通过使用场景,测试人员对他们贡献的价值的看法以及他们对工作的感受显然是最高评级的因素。结论:这项工作可以作为测试团队中其他公司评估测试工件的使用以及测试活动如何改进TX的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How do Testers Feel it? An Experience Report on Evaluating TX in an Industrial Context
Background: Software development is almost always performed by teams. Consequently, several factors such as environment, human aspects, and technologies adopted are likely to affect individual and team performance. Method: Motivated by this context, we conducted a survey with 27 testers of the SIDIA Institute of Science and Technology. The goal was to understand how human and technological aspects can affect test effectiveness, by considering the practitioners’ perspective on their homologation testing review practices with respect three aspects: the testing infrastructure, how they perceive the value of their contribution, and how they feel about their work. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of testers’ perception using the Tester Experience (TX) approach was conducted. Results: Our results show that by using scenarios, the testers’ perceptions with respect to the value of their contribution and how they feel about their work were clearly the highest rated factors. Conclusion: This work can serve as a basis for other companies in their testing teams to evaluate how the use of testing artifacts and how testing activities can improve TX.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信