中国能源消费、技术进步与经济增长的动态关系研究

Jian Wang
{"title":"中国能源消费、技术进步与经济增长的动态关系研究","authors":"Jian Wang","doi":"10.1109/ISMOT.2012.6679518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the sample of 1978-2010, vector auto regression model of energy consumption, technical progress and economic growth is established. The relationships are empirically analyzed using the method of cointegration test, Granger causality test, impulse response function and variance decomposition. Conclusions are obtained as follows: In the long term, there is a negative correlation between energy consumption and economic growth in China, and technical progress has a significant positive effect on economic growth. In the short term, technical progress, economic growth is the Granger causality of energy consumption. Impulse response of economic growth to energy intensity is firstly positive, and then negative. The impact of technical progress on economic growth is positive, which has an inhibitory effect on energy consumption.","PeriodicalId":329450,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Symposium on Management of Technology (ISMOT)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on dynamical relationships between energy consumption, technical progress and economic growth in China\",\"authors\":\"Jian Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISMOT.2012.6679518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on the sample of 1978-2010, vector auto regression model of energy consumption, technical progress and economic growth is established. The relationships are empirically analyzed using the method of cointegration test, Granger causality test, impulse response function and variance decomposition. Conclusions are obtained as follows: In the long term, there is a negative correlation between energy consumption and economic growth in China, and technical progress has a significant positive effect on economic growth. In the short term, technical progress, economic growth is the Granger causality of energy consumption. Impulse response of economic growth to energy intensity is firstly positive, and then negative. The impact of technical progress on economic growth is positive, which has an inhibitory effect on energy consumption.\",\"PeriodicalId\":329450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 International Symposium on Management of Technology (ISMOT)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 International Symposium on Management of Technology (ISMOT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMOT.2012.6679518\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Symposium on Management of Technology (ISMOT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMOT.2012.6679518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

以1978-2010年为样本,建立了能源消费、技术进步与经济增长的向量自回归模型。采用协整检验、格兰杰因果检验、脉冲响应函数和方差分解等方法对两者之间的关系进行实证分析。研究结果表明:从长期来看,中国能源消费与经济增长呈负相关,技术进步对经济增长具有显著的正向作用。短期内,技术进步、经济增长是能源消耗的格兰杰因果关系。经济增长对能源强度的脉冲响应先为正,后为负。技术进步对经济增长的影响为正,对能源消费有抑制作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study on dynamical relationships between energy consumption, technical progress and economic growth in China
Based on the sample of 1978-2010, vector auto regression model of energy consumption, technical progress and economic growth is established. The relationships are empirically analyzed using the method of cointegration test, Granger causality test, impulse response function and variance decomposition. Conclusions are obtained as follows: In the long term, there is a negative correlation between energy consumption and economic growth in China, and technical progress has a significant positive effect on economic growth. In the short term, technical progress, economic growth is the Granger causality of energy consumption. Impulse response of economic growth to energy intensity is firstly positive, and then negative. The impact of technical progress on economic growth is positive, which has an inhibitory effect on energy consumption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信