没有被拍卖办公室宣读的处罚

I. N. G. Wijaya
{"title":"没有被拍卖办公室宣读的处罚","authors":"I. N. G. Wijaya","doi":"10.26905/idjch.v13i2.5896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Auction minutes that the Class II Auction Officer does not read will affect their validity. The problem in this paper is about how the validity of the deed is not read out by the auction official, as well as the form of legal protection for the Class II Auction Officer for acceptable sanctions due to the auction minutes not being read out in the implementation of an electronic non-execution auction. This paper aims to analyze the validity of the deed that was not read out by the auction official in the performance of an electronic non-execution auction and a form of legal protection for Class II auction officials. This writing uses a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The study results indicate that the minutes of auction through the internet media have fulfilled the elements contained in Article 1868 of the Civil Code. Legal protection for Class II Auction Officials can be carried out in 2 (two) ways: preventive legal protection, namely by making new rules or improving the provisions of the old laws. Repressive legal protection is to take legal action in the form of an appeal against the Administrative Court or an appeal against the Supreme Court. In the request and cassation, repressive legal protection should be prioritized.How to cite item: Wijaya, I. N. G., (2022), Sanctions for not being read out by the auction office. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(2). 164-174. doi:10.26905/idjch.v13i2.7741.","PeriodicalId":207438,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sanctions for not being read out by the auction office\",\"authors\":\"I. N. G. Wijaya\",\"doi\":\"10.26905/idjch.v13i2.5896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Auction minutes that the Class II Auction Officer does not read will affect their validity. The problem in this paper is about how the validity of the deed is not read out by the auction official, as well as the form of legal protection for the Class II Auction Officer for acceptable sanctions due to the auction minutes not being read out in the implementation of an electronic non-execution auction. This paper aims to analyze the validity of the deed that was not read out by the auction official in the performance of an electronic non-execution auction and a form of legal protection for Class II auction officials. This writing uses a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The study results indicate that the minutes of auction through the internet media have fulfilled the elements contained in Article 1868 of the Civil Code. Legal protection for Class II Auction Officials can be carried out in 2 (two) ways: preventive legal protection, namely by making new rules or improving the provisions of the old laws. Repressive legal protection is to take legal action in the form of an appeal against the Administrative Court or an appeal against the Supreme Court. In the request and cassation, repressive legal protection should be prioritized.How to cite item: Wijaya, I. N. G., (2022), Sanctions for not being read out by the auction office. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(2). 164-174. doi:10.26905/idjch.v13i2.7741.\",\"PeriodicalId\":207438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i2.5896\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i2.5896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第二级拍卖主任如未阅读拍卖记录,将会影响其有效性。本文的问题是关于拍卖官员如何不宣读契约的有效性,以及在实施电子非执行拍卖时,由于拍卖记录未被宣读,二级拍卖官员可接受的制裁的法律保护形式。本文旨在分析电子不执行拍卖中拍卖官员未宣读契约的效力以及二级拍卖官员的一种法律保护形式。这篇文章使用了规范性的法律方法和法定和概念的方法。研究结果表明,网络媒体拍卖记录符合《民法典》第1868条的规定。对二级拍卖官员的法律保护可以通过两种方式进行:预防性法律保护,即制定新规则或完善旧法律的规定。压制性法律保护是对行政法院或最高法院采取上诉形式的法律行动。在请求和撤销案件中,应优先考虑压制性法律保护。引用方式:Wijaya, i.n.g.,(2022),未被拍卖办公室宣读的处罚。中华医学杂志,13(2)。164 - 174。doi: 10.26905 / idjch.v13i2.7741。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sanctions for not being read out by the auction office
Auction minutes that the Class II Auction Officer does not read will affect their validity. The problem in this paper is about how the validity of the deed is not read out by the auction official, as well as the form of legal protection for the Class II Auction Officer for acceptable sanctions due to the auction minutes not being read out in the implementation of an electronic non-execution auction. This paper aims to analyze the validity of the deed that was not read out by the auction official in the performance of an electronic non-execution auction and a form of legal protection for Class II auction officials. This writing uses a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The study results indicate that the minutes of auction through the internet media have fulfilled the elements contained in Article 1868 of the Civil Code. Legal protection for Class II Auction Officials can be carried out in 2 (two) ways: preventive legal protection, namely by making new rules or improving the provisions of the old laws. Repressive legal protection is to take legal action in the form of an appeal against the Administrative Court or an appeal against the Supreme Court. In the request and cassation, repressive legal protection should be prioritized.How to cite item: Wijaya, I. N. G., (2022), Sanctions for not being read out by the auction office. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(2). 164-174. doi:10.26905/idjch.v13i2.7741.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信