未来移动通信系统的保留多址协议

P. Taaghol, R. Tafazolli, B. Evans
{"title":"未来移动通信系统的保留多址协议","authors":"P. Taaghol, R. Tafazolli, B. Evans","doi":"10.1109/VETEC.1997.605637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The need for high capacity and flexible air interface is driven by service requirements of the future third generation communication systems. Among the design parameters, not only does the choice multiple access technique greatly influence the spectrum efficiency, it also dictates the total system design. Despite the recent phenomenal growth in the number of proposed multiple access protocols for voice/data systems, general methods for comparison are lacking in the literature. A comprehensive performance comparison of an important class of multi-access protocols, known as reservation-based random access protocols, is presented. Two main performance evaluation techniques are used: (1) cross comparison and (2) internal comparison. In the former method, the performances of protocols are compared with each other under the same system specifications. In the latter method, protocols are compared against their respective dynamic upper bounds. This dynamic upper bound is mathematically analysed using the \"queueing theory\". Then, a comprehensive comparison of the existing reservation-based protocols is performed and discussed using the both collation methods. Finally, conclusions are drawn and future research directions are proposed.","PeriodicalId":389634,"journal":{"name":"1997 IEEE 47th Vehicular Technology Conference. Technology in Motion","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the reservation multiple access protocols for future mobile communication systems\",\"authors\":\"P. Taaghol, R. Tafazolli, B. Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VETEC.1997.605637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The need for high capacity and flexible air interface is driven by service requirements of the future third generation communication systems. Among the design parameters, not only does the choice multiple access technique greatly influence the spectrum efficiency, it also dictates the total system design. Despite the recent phenomenal growth in the number of proposed multiple access protocols for voice/data systems, general methods for comparison are lacking in the literature. A comprehensive performance comparison of an important class of multi-access protocols, known as reservation-based random access protocols, is presented. Two main performance evaluation techniques are used: (1) cross comparison and (2) internal comparison. In the former method, the performances of protocols are compared with each other under the same system specifications. In the latter method, protocols are compared against their respective dynamic upper bounds. This dynamic upper bound is mathematically analysed using the \\\"queueing theory\\\". Then, a comprehensive comparison of the existing reservation-based protocols is performed and discussed using the both collation methods. Finally, conclusions are drawn and future research directions are proposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":389634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1997 IEEE 47th Vehicular Technology Conference. Technology in Motion\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1997 IEEE 47th Vehicular Technology Conference. Technology in Motion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VETEC.1997.605637\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1997 IEEE 47th Vehicular Technology Conference. Technology in Motion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VETEC.1997.605637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

未来第三代通信系统的业务需求推动了对高容量、灵活的空中接口的需求。在设计参数中,多址技术的选择不仅对频谱效率有很大的影响,而且决定了整个系统的设计。尽管最近提出的语音/数据系统的多重访问协议数量显著增长,但文献中缺乏通用的比较方法。对一类重要的多接入协议——基于预约的随机接入协议进行了全面的性能比较。使用了两种主要的绩效评估技术:(1)交叉比较和(2)内部比较。在前一种方法中,在相同的系统规格下,对协议的性能进行比较。在后一种方法中,将协议与各自的动态上界进行比较。利用“排队论”对这一动态上界进行了数学分析。然后,对现有的基于预约的协议进行了全面的比较,并使用这两种整理方法进行了讨论。最后,本文得出了结论,并提出了未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the reservation multiple access protocols for future mobile communication systems
The need for high capacity and flexible air interface is driven by service requirements of the future third generation communication systems. Among the design parameters, not only does the choice multiple access technique greatly influence the spectrum efficiency, it also dictates the total system design. Despite the recent phenomenal growth in the number of proposed multiple access protocols for voice/data systems, general methods for comparison are lacking in the literature. A comprehensive performance comparison of an important class of multi-access protocols, known as reservation-based random access protocols, is presented. Two main performance evaluation techniques are used: (1) cross comparison and (2) internal comparison. In the former method, the performances of protocols are compared with each other under the same system specifications. In the latter method, protocols are compared against their respective dynamic upper bounds. This dynamic upper bound is mathematically analysed using the "queueing theory". Then, a comprehensive comparison of the existing reservation-based protocols is performed and discussed using the both collation methods. Finally, conclusions are drawn and future research directions are proposed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信