Magurele油田开发气举注水井热模拟:未来策略

Halafawi M
{"title":"Magurele油田开发气举注水井热模拟:未来策略","authors":"Halafawi M","doi":"10.23880/ppej-16000310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A secondary recovery techniques are those used after natural energy depletion of an oil or a gas reservoir to boost its production such as gas lift and water injection. Both methods have been proved their success and effectiveness for enhancing field production. However, each reservoir or field has its own criteria and they may be ineffective depending field criteria and future plans. Furthermore, a field development strategy is considered as a key activity for enhancing the field recovery. Therefore, the aim of this article is to do well thermal simulation and analysis during making gas lift and water injection for Magurele field development at different conditions such temperature, tubing size, and production parameters. Several strategies are suggested from putting a new drilled well (M#206) on production till abandonment. A sensitivity study is done to know the effect geothermal zones and tubing size on well performance and flow regimes. It was found that utilizing a reservoir temperature of 70°C and tubing 3 1/2, all production activities displayed normal fluid and wellbore temperature profiles, using larger tubing or producing from the high temperature (HT) zone has only a minimal impact on the pressure profile, only slightly increasing surface pressures and The suggested production activities are unaffected by the higher temperature. With regard to the flow regime created by strategies, starting usage circumstances for tubing 3 1/2\", with the exception of injection, which is turbulent in all scenarios, the flow regime is slug flow between 70°C and HT zones. Additionally, it seems like the bubbly flow is at shallower depths. Due to the use of 4 1/2-inch, the flow regime is altered to transitional and bubbly flows at deeper depths. This study helps to maximize the reservoir output and keep the new drilled wells usable and useful as long as possible.","PeriodicalId":282073,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermal Simulations of Gas Lift and Water Injection Wells for Magurele Field Development: Future Strategies\",\"authors\":\"Halafawi M\",\"doi\":\"10.23880/ppej-16000310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A secondary recovery techniques are those used after natural energy depletion of an oil or a gas reservoir to boost its production such as gas lift and water injection. Both methods have been proved their success and effectiveness for enhancing field production. However, each reservoir or field has its own criteria and they may be ineffective depending field criteria and future plans. Furthermore, a field development strategy is considered as a key activity for enhancing the field recovery. Therefore, the aim of this article is to do well thermal simulation and analysis during making gas lift and water injection for Magurele field development at different conditions such temperature, tubing size, and production parameters. Several strategies are suggested from putting a new drilled well (M#206) on production till abandonment. A sensitivity study is done to know the effect geothermal zones and tubing size on well performance and flow regimes. It was found that utilizing a reservoir temperature of 70°C and tubing 3 1/2, all production activities displayed normal fluid and wellbore temperature profiles, using larger tubing or producing from the high temperature (HT) zone has only a minimal impact on the pressure profile, only slightly increasing surface pressures and The suggested production activities are unaffected by the higher temperature. With regard to the flow regime created by strategies, starting usage circumstances for tubing 3 1/2\\\", with the exception of injection, which is turbulent in all scenarios, the flow regime is slug flow between 70°C and HT zones. Additionally, it seems like the bubbly flow is at shallower depths. Due to the use of 4 1/2-inch, the flow regime is altered to transitional and bubbly flows at deeper depths. This study helps to maximize the reservoir output and keep the new drilled wells usable and useful as long as possible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":282073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23880/ppej-16000310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/ppej-16000310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

二次采油技术是指在油气储层自然能量枯竭后用于提高产量的技术,如气举和注水等。实践证明,这两种方法在提高油田产量方面是成功和有效的。然而,每个油藏或油田都有自己的标准,根据油田标准和未来计划,这些标准可能无效。此外,油田开发战略被认为是提高油田采收率的关键活动。因此,本文的目的是在不同温度、油管尺寸、生产参数等条件下,对Magurele油田开发气举和注水过程进行井热模拟和分析。从新井(m# 206)投产到弃井,提出了几种策略。通过敏感性研究,了解了地热区和油管尺寸对油井性能和流动状态的影响。研究发现,当储层温度为70°C,油管为3 1/2时,所有的生产活动都显示正常的流体和井筒温度曲线,使用更大的油管或从高温(HT)区开采对压力曲线的影响很小,只会略微增加地面压力,并且建议的生产活动不受更高温度的影响。关于策略所产生的流动状态,除了注入外,3 1/2”油管在所有情况下都是湍流状态,在70°C和高温区域之间的流动状态为段塞流。此外,气泡流似乎在较浅的深度。由于使用了4 1/2英寸,在更深的深度,流动形式改变为过渡和气泡流动。这项研究有助于最大限度地提高储层产量,并尽可能长时间地保持新钻井的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thermal Simulations of Gas Lift and Water Injection Wells for Magurele Field Development: Future Strategies
A secondary recovery techniques are those used after natural energy depletion of an oil or a gas reservoir to boost its production such as gas lift and water injection. Both methods have been proved their success and effectiveness for enhancing field production. However, each reservoir or field has its own criteria and they may be ineffective depending field criteria and future plans. Furthermore, a field development strategy is considered as a key activity for enhancing the field recovery. Therefore, the aim of this article is to do well thermal simulation and analysis during making gas lift and water injection for Magurele field development at different conditions such temperature, tubing size, and production parameters. Several strategies are suggested from putting a new drilled well (M#206) on production till abandonment. A sensitivity study is done to know the effect geothermal zones and tubing size on well performance and flow regimes. It was found that utilizing a reservoir temperature of 70°C and tubing 3 1/2, all production activities displayed normal fluid and wellbore temperature profiles, using larger tubing or producing from the high temperature (HT) zone has only a minimal impact on the pressure profile, only slightly increasing surface pressures and The suggested production activities are unaffected by the higher temperature. With regard to the flow regime created by strategies, starting usage circumstances for tubing 3 1/2", with the exception of injection, which is turbulent in all scenarios, the flow regime is slug flow between 70°C and HT zones. Additionally, it seems like the bubbly flow is at shallower depths. Due to the use of 4 1/2-inch, the flow regime is altered to transitional and bubbly flows at deeper depths. This study helps to maximize the reservoir output and keep the new drilled wells usable and useful as long as possible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信