对SRISK作为监管杠杆率替代方案的批判

Dov Fischer
{"title":"对SRISK作为监管杠杆率替代方案的批判","authors":"Dov Fischer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2614870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, Robert Engle and colleagues at New York University developed the NYU Stern Systematic Risk Model (SRISK), a market-based substitute for regulatory measures of systemic risk of financial institutions. This study identifies four shortcomings of SRISK. First, market value is not an adequate substitute for book value in measuring systemic risk. Second, SRISK fails to account for credit derivatives and other off-balance sheet risk. Third, the market data captured by SRISK itself relies on regulatory disclosures. Fourth, SRISK cannot be applied to private firms.","PeriodicalId":315186,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Sustainable Capitalism (Topic)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critique of SRISK as an Alternative to Regulatory Leverage Ratio\",\"authors\":\"Dov Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2614870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, Robert Engle and colleagues at New York University developed the NYU Stern Systematic Risk Model (SRISK), a market-based substitute for regulatory measures of systemic risk of financial institutions. This study identifies four shortcomings of SRISK. First, market value is not an adequate substitute for book value in measuring systemic risk. Second, SRISK fails to account for credit derivatives and other off-balance sheet risk. Third, the market data captured by SRISK itself relies on regulatory disclosures. Fourth, SRISK cannot be applied to private firms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Sustainable Capitalism (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Sustainable Capitalism (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2614870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Sustainable Capitalism (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2614870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2008年金融危机之后,纽约大学的罗伯特·恩格尔(Robert Engle)及其同事开发了纽约大学斯特恩系统风险模型(SRISK),这是一种基于市场的替代金融机构系统性风险监管措施的模型。这项研究确定了SRISK的四个缺点。首先,在衡量系统性风险时,市场价值不能充分替代账面价值。其次,SRISK没有考虑信用衍生品和其他表外风险。第三,SRISK自身获取的市场数据依赖于监管披露。第四,SRISK不能应用于私营企业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Critique of SRISK as an Alternative to Regulatory Leverage Ratio
In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, Robert Engle and colleagues at New York University developed the NYU Stern Systematic Risk Model (SRISK), a market-based substitute for regulatory measures of systemic risk of financial institutions. This study identifies four shortcomings of SRISK. First, market value is not an adequate substitute for book value in measuring systemic risk. Second, SRISK fails to account for credit derivatives and other off-balance sheet risk. Third, the market data captured by SRISK itself relies on regulatory disclosures. Fourth, SRISK cannot be applied to private firms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信